linux/kernel/up.c

/*
 * Uniprocessor-only support functions.  The counterpart to kernel/smp.c
 */

#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>

int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
				int wait)
{
	WARN_ON(cpu != 0);

	local_irq_disable();
	(func)(info);
	local_irq_enable();

	return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single);
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-09 20:27:08 +00:00			`/*`
			`* Uniprocessor-only support functions. The counterpart to kernel/smp.c`
			`*/`

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix #2 fix m68k build failure: tip/kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single': tip/kernel/up.c:16: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type make[2]: *** [kernel/up.o] Error 1 Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-12 15:04:37 +00:00			`#include <linux/interrupt.h>`
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-09 20:27:08 +00:00			`#include <linux/kernel.h>`
			`#include <linux/module.h>`
			`#include <linux/smp.h>`

			`int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, void (func) (void info), void *info,`
			`int wait)`
			`{`
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix Impact: build fix on Alpha kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single': kernel/up.c:12: error: 'cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/up.c:12: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/up.c:12: error: for each function it appears in.) The typo didnt show up on x86 because 'cpuid' happens to be a function address as well ... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-11 04:15:21 +00:00			`WARN_ON(cpu != 0);`

smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-09 20:27:08 +00:00			`local_irq_disable();`
			`(func)(info);`
			`local_irq_enable();`
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid, fix Impact: build fix on Alpha kernel/up.c: In function 'smp_call_function_single': kernel/up.c:12: error: 'cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function) kernel/up.c:12: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once kernel/up.c:12: error: for each function it appears in.) The typo didnt show up on x86 because 'cpuid' happens to be a function address as well ... Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-11 04:15:21 +00:00
smp_call_function_single(): be slightly less stupid If you do smp_call_function_single(expression-with-side-effects, ...) then expression-with-side-effects never gets evaluated on UP builds. As always, implementing it in C is the correct thing to do. While we're there, uninline it for size and possible header dependency reasons. And create a new kernel/up.c, as a place in which to put uniprocessor-specific code and storage. It should mirror kernel/smp.c. Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> 2009-01-09 20:27:08 +00:00			`return 0;`
			`}`
			`EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single);`