mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 21:05:13 +00:00
arm/arm64: KVM: vgic: kick the specific vcpu instead of iterating through all
When call kvm_vgic_inject_irq to inject interrupt, we can known which vcpu the interrupt for by the irq_num and the cpuid. So we should just kick this vcpu to avoid iterating through all. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b1e952b4e4
commit
016ed39c54
@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ static int vgic_validate_injection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq, int level)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static bool vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
|
static int vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
|
||||||
unsigned int irq_num, bool level)
|
unsigned int irq_num, bool level)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
|
struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
|
||||||
@ -1673,7 +1673,7 @@ static bool vgic_update_irq_pending(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid,
|
|||||||
out:
|
out:
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&dist->lock);
|
spin_unlock(&dist->lock);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return ret;
|
return ret ? cpuid : -EINVAL;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
@ -1693,9 +1693,14 @@ out:
|
|||||||
int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int irq_num,
|
int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int irq_num,
|
||||||
bool level)
|
bool level)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm)) &&
|
int vcpu_id;
|
||||||
vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, irq_num, level))
|
|
||||||
vgic_kick_vcpus(kvm);
|
if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) {
|
||||||
|
vcpu_id = vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, irq_num, level);
|
||||||
|
if (vcpu_id >= 0)
|
||||||
|
/* kick the specified vcpu */
|
||||||
|
kvm_vcpu_kick(kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_id));
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user