staging: gasket: apex: Prefer using the BIT macro

Challenge suggested by coccinelle.

Replace bit shifting on 1 with the BIT(x) macro.
Coccinelle script:

@@
constant c;
@@

-(1 << c)
+BIT(c)

Signed-off-by: Sanjana Sanikommu <sanjana99reddy99@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Sanjana Sanikommu 2019-03-28 20:04:24 +05:30 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent bdcca44e16
commit 0412737212

View File

@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static int apex_enter_reset(struct gasket_dev *gasket_dev)
/* - Wait for RAM shutdown. */
if (gasket_wait_with_reschedule(gasket_dev, APEX_BAR_INDEX,
APEX_BAR2_REG_SCU_3, 1 << 6, 1 << 6,
APEX_BAR2_REG_SCU_3, BIT(6), BIT(6),
APEX_RESET_DELAY, APEX_RESET_RETRY)) {
dev_err(gasket_dev->dev,
"RAM did not shut down within timeout (%d ms)\n",
@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static int apex_quit_reset(struct gasket_dev *gasket_dev)
/* - Wait for RAM enable. */
if (gasket_wait_with_reschedule(gasket_dev, APEX_BAR_INDEX,
APEX_BAR2_REG_SCU_3, 1 << 6, 0,
APEX_BAR2_REG_SCU_3, BIT(6), 0,
APEX_RESET_DELAY, APEX_RESET_RETRY)) {
dev_err(gasket_dev->dev,
"RAM did not enable within timeout (%d ms)\n",