mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 04:17:47 +00:00
ALSA: pcm: use goto statement instead of while statement to reduce indentation
In a process to calculate parameters of PCM substream, application of all rules is iterated several times till parameter dependencies are satisfied. In current implementation, two loops are used for the design, however this brings two-level indentation and decline readability. This commit attempts to reduce the indentation by using goto statement, instead of outer while loop. Signed-off-by: Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9cc07f55d4
commit
0d4e399965
@ -337,54 +337,56 @@ static int constrain_params_by_rules(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
|
||||
rstamps[k] = 0;
|
||||
for (k = 0; k <= SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_LAST_INTERVAL; k++)
|
||||
vstamps[k] = (params->rmask & (1 << k)) ? 1 : 0;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
again = 0;
|
||||
for (k = 0; k < constrs->rules_num; k++) {
|
||||
struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *r = &constrs->rules[k];
|
||||
unsigned int d;
|
||||
int doit = 0;
|
||||
if (r->cond && !(r->cond & params->flags))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
for (d = 0; r->deps[d] >= 0; d++) {
|
||||
if (vstamps[r->deps[d]] > rstamps[k]) {
|
||||
doit = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
again = 0;
|
||||
for (k = 0; k < constrs->rules_num; k++) {
|
||||
struct snd_pcm_hw_rule *r = &constrs->rules[k];
|
||||
unsigned int d;
|
||||
int doit = 0;
|
||||
if (r->cond && !(r->cond & params->flags))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
for (d = 0; r->deps[d] >= 0; d++) {
|
||||
if (vstamps[r->deps[d]] > rstamps[k]) {
|
||||
doit = 1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!doit)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (trace_hw_mask_param_enabled()) {
|
||||
if (hw_is_mask(r->var))
|
||||
old_mask = *hw_param_mask(params, r->var);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trace_hw_interval_param_enabled()) {
|
||||
if (hw_is_interval(r->var))
|
||||
old_interval = *hw_param_interval(params, r->var);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
changed = r->func(params, r);
|
||||
|
||||
if (hw_is_mask(r->var)) {
|
||||
trace_hw_mask_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
|
||||
&old_mask, hw_param_mask(params, r->var));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (hw_is_interval(r->var)) {
|
||||
trace_hw_interval_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
|
||||
&old_interval, hw_param_interval(params, r->var));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rstamps[k] = stamp;
|
||||
if (changed && r->var >= 0) {
|
||||
params->cmask |= (1 << r->var);
|
||||
vstamps[r->var] = stamp;
|
||||
again = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (changed < 0)
|
||||
return changed;
|
||||
stamp++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while (again);
|
||||
if (!doit)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (trace_hw_mask_param_enabled()) {
|
||||
if (hw_is_mask(r->var))
|
||||
old_mask = *hw_param_mask(params, r->var);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (trace_hw_interval_param_enabled()) {
|
||||
if (hw_is_interval(r->var))
|
||||
old_interval = *hw_param_interval(params, r->var);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
changed = r->func(params, r);
|
||||
|
||||
if (hw_is_mask(r->var)) {
|
||||
trace_hw_mask_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
|
||||
&old_mask, hw_param_mask(params, r->var));
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (hw_is_interval(r->var)) {
|
||||
trace_hw_interval_param(substream, r->var, k + 1,
|
||||
&old_interval, hw_param_interval(params, r->var));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rstamps[k] = stamp;
|
||||
if (changed && r->var >= 0) {
|
||||
params->cmask |= (1 << r->var);
|
||||
vstamps[r->var] = stamp;
|
||||
again = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (changed < 0)
|
||||
return changed;
|
||||
stamp++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (again)
|
||||
goto retry;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user