FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-15 21:30:43 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ACPI: Clarify resource conflict message

Browse Source 
The message "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver" is misleading. The
device _may_ need an ACPI driver, if the BIOS implemented a custom
API for the device in question (which, AFAIK, can't be checked.) If
not, then either a generic ACPI driver may be used (for example
"thermal"), or nothing can be done (other than a white list).

I propose to reword the message to:

ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for this device, you should use
it instead of the native driver

which I think is more correct. Comments and suggestions welcome.

I also added a message warning about possible problems and system
instability when users pass acpi_enforce_resources=lax, as suggested
by Len.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jean Delvare 2009-09-08 15:31:46 +02:00 committed by Len Brown
parent b684a3637e
commit 14f03343ad
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
drivers/acpi/osl.c
View File

@ -1161,7 +1161,13 @@ int acpi_check_resource_conflict(struct resource *res)
res_list_elem->name,
(long long) res_list_elem->start,
(long long) res_list_elem->end);
printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver\n");
if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_LAX)
printk(KERN_NOTICE "ACPI: This conflict may"
" cause random problems and system"
" instability\n");
printk(KERN_INFO "ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available"
" for this device, you should use it instead of"
" the native driver\n");
}
if (acpi_enforce_resources == ENFORCE_RESOURCES_STRICT)
return -EBUSY;