FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-22 09:22:37 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

genirq: Keep chip buslock across irq_request/release_resources()

Browse Source 
Moving the irq_request/release_resources() callbacks out of the spinlocked,
irq disabled and bus locked region, unearthed an interesting abuse of the
irq_bus_lock/irq_bus_sync_unlock() callbacks.

The OMAP GPIO driver does merily power management inside of them. The
irq_request_resources() callback of this GPIO irqchip calls a function
which reads a GPIO register. That read aborts now because the clock of the
GPIO block is not magically enabled via the irq_bus_lock() callback.

Move the callbacks under the bus lock again to prevent this. In the
free_irq() path this requires to drop the bus_lock before calling
synchronize_irq() and reaquiring it before calling the
irq_release_resources() callback.

The bus lock can't be held because:

   1) The data which has been changed between bus_lock/un_lock is cached in
      the irq chip driver private data and needs to go out to the irq chip
      via the slow bus (usually SPI or I2C) before calling
      synchronize_irq().

      That's the reason why this bus_lock/unlock magic exists in the first
      place, as you cannot do SPI/I2C transactions while holding desc->lock
      with interrupts disabled.

   2) synchronize_irq() will actually deadlock, if there is a handler on
      flight. These chips use threaded handlers for obvious reasons, as
      they allow to do SPI/I2C communication. When the threaded handler
      returns then bus_lock needs to be taken in irq_finalize_oneshot() as
      we need to talk to the actual irq chip once more. After that the
      threaded handler is marked done, which makes synchronize_irq() return.

      So if we hold bus_lock accross the synchronize_irq() call, the
      handler cannot mark itself done because it blocks on the bus
      lock. That in turn makes synchronize_irq() wait forever on the
      threaded handler to complete....

Add the missing unlock of desc->request_mutex in the error path of
__free_irq() and add a bunch of comments to explain the locking and
protection rules.

Fixes: 46e48e2573 ("genirq: Move irq resource handling out of spinlocked region")
Reported-and-tested-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.co.uk>
Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Not-longer-ranted-at-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner 2017-07-11 23:41:52 +02:00
parent c5c601c429
commit 19d39a3810
1 changed files with 53 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

63
kernel/irq/manage.c
View File

@ -1090,6 +1090,16 @@ setup_irq_thread(struct irqaction *new, unsigned int irq, bool secondary)
/*
* Internal function to register an irqaction - typically used to
* allocate special interrupts that are part of the architecture.
*
* Locking rules:
*
* desc->request_mutex Provides serialization against a concurrent free_irq()
* chip_bus_lock Provides serialization for slow bus operations
* desc->lock Provides serialization against hard interrupts
*
* chip_bus_lock and desc->lock are sufficient for all other management and
* interrupt related functions. desc->request_mutex solely serializes
* request/free_irq().
*/
static int
__setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
@ -1167,20 +1177,35 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
if (desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)
new->flags &= ~IRQF_ONESHOT;
/*
* Protects against a concurrent __free_irq() call which might wait
* for synchronize_irq() to complete without holding the optional
* chip bus lock and desc->lock.
*/
mutex_lock(&desc->request_mutex);
/*
* Acquire bus lock as the irq_request_resources() callback below
* might rely on the serialization or the magic power management
* functions which are abusing the irq_bus_lock() callback,
*/
chip_bus_lock(desc);
/* First installed action requests resources. */
if (!desc->action) {
ret = irq_request_resources(desc);
if (ret) {
pr_err("Failed to request resources for %s (irq %d) on irqchip %s\n",
new->name, irq, desc->irq_data.chip->name);
goto out_mutex;
goto out_bus_unlock;
}
}
chip_bus_lock(desc);
/*
* The following block of code has to be executed atomically
* protected against a concurrent interrupt and any of the other
* management calls which are not serialized via
* desc->request_mutex or the optional bus lock.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
old_ptr = &desc->action;
@ -1286,11 +1311,9 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
ret = __irq_set_trigger(desc,
new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK);
if (ret) {
irq_release_resources(desc);
if (ret)
goto out_unlock;
}
}
desc->istate &= ~(IRQS_AUTODETECT | IRQS_SPURIOUS_DISABLED | \
IRQS_ONESHOT | IRQS_WAITING);
@ -1385,12 +1408,10 @@ mismatch:
out_unlock:
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
if (!desc->action)
irq_release_resources(desc);
out_mutex:
out_bus_unlock:
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
out_thread:
@ -1472,6 +1493,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
WARN(1, "Trying to free already-free IRQ %d\n", irq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
mutex_unlock(&desc->request_mutex);
return NULL;
}
@ -1498,6 +1520,20 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
#endif
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
/*
* Drop bus_lock here so the changes which were done in the chip
* callbacks above are synced out to the irq chips which hang
* behind a slow bus (I2C, SPI) before calling synchronize_irq().
*
* Aside of that the bus_lock can also be taken from the threaded
* handler in irq_finalize_oneshot() which results in a deadlock
* because synchronize_irq() would wait forever for the thread to
* complete, which is blocked on the bus lock.
*
* The still held desc->request_mutex() protects against a
* concurrent request_irq() of this irq so the release of resources
* and timing data is properly serialized.
*/
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
unregister_handler_proc(irq, action);
@ -1530,8 +1566,15 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
}
}
/* Last action releases resources */
if (!desc->action) {
/*
* Reaquire bus lock as irq_release_resources() might
* require it to deallocate resources over the slow bus.
*/
chip_bus_lock(desc);
irq_release_resources(desc);
chip_bus_sync_unlock(desc);
irq_remove_timings(desc);
}