mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-30 13:38:40 +00:00
x86/efi-bgrt: Switch pr_err() to pr_debug() for invalid BGRT
It's totally legitimate, per the ACPI spec, for the firmware to set the BGRT 'status' field to zero to indicate that the BGRT image isn't being displayed, and we shouldn't be printing an error message in that case because it's just noise for users. So swap pr_err() for pr_debug(). However, Josh points that out it still makes sense to test the validity of the upper 7 bits of the 'status' field, since they're marked as "reserved" in the spec and must be zero. If firmware violates this it really *is* an error. Reported-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> Tested-by: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1438936621-5215-2-git-send-email-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87db73aebf
commit
248fbcd5ae
@ -50,11 +50,16 @@ void __init efi_bgrt_init(void)
|
||||
bgrt_tab->version);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bgrt_tab->status != 1) {
|
||||
pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: invalid status %u (expected 1)\n",
|
||||
if (bgrt_tab->status & 0xfe) {
|
||||
pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: reserved status bits are non-zero %u\n",
|
||||
bgrt_tab->status);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bgrt_tab->status != 1) {
|
||||
pr_debug("Ignoring BGRT: invalid status %u (expected 1)\n",
|
||||
bgrt_tab->status);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bgrt_tab->image_type != 0) {
|
||||
pr_err("Ignoring BGRT: invalid image type %u (expected 0)\n",
|
||||
bgrt_tab->image_type);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user