mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-30 13:38:40 +00:00
netfilter: nf_tables: return EBUSY if device already belongs to flowtable
If the netdevice is already part of a flowtable, return EBUSY. I cannot find a valid usecase for having two flowtables bound to the same netdevice. We can still have two flowtable where the device set is disjoint. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7d98386d55
commit
32fc718751
@ -5037,9 +5037,9 @@ static int nf_tables_newflowtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct nfgenmsg *nfmsg = nlmsg_data(nlh);
|
||||
const struct nf_flowtable_type *type;
|
||||
struct nft_flowtable *flowtable, *ft;
|
||||
u8 genmask = nft_genmask_next(net);
|
||||
int family = nfmsg->nfgen_family;
|
||||
struct nft_flowtable *flowtable;
|
||||
struct nft_table *table;
|
||||
struct nft_ctx ctx;
|
||||
int err, i, k;
|
||||
@ -5099,6 +5099,22 @@ static int nf_tables_newflowtable(struct net *net, struct sock *nlsk,
|
||||
goto err3;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < flowtable->ops_len; i++) {
|
||||
if (!flowtable->ops[i].dev)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(ft, &table->flowtables, list) {
|
||||
for (k = 0; k < ft->ops_len; k++) {
|
||||
if (!ft->ops[k].dev)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (flowtable->ops[i].dev == ft->ops[k].dev &&
|
||||
flowtable->ops[i].pf == ft->ops[k].pf) {
|
||||
err = -EBUSY;
|
||||
goto err4;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = nf_register_net_hook(net, &flowtable->ops[i]);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto err4;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user