FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-14 04:41:26 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[PATCH] locks: don't do unnecessary allocations

Browse Source 
posix_lock_file() always allocates new locks in advance, even if it's easy to
determine that no allocations will be needed.

Optimize these cases:

 - FL_ACCESS flag is set

 - Unlocking the whole range

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Miklos Szeredi 2006-06-23 02:05:10 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 0d9a490abe
commit 39005d022a
1 changed files with 10 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
fs/locks.c
View File

@ -794,7 +794,8 @@ out:
static int __posix_lock_file_conf(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request, struct file_lock *conflock)
{
struct file_lock *fl;
struct file_lock *new_fl, *new_fl2;
struct file_lock *new_fl = NULL;
struct file_lock *new_fl2 = NULL;
struct file_lock *left = NULL;
struct file_lock *right = NULL;
struct file_lock **before;
@ -803,9 +804,15 @@ static int __posix_lock_file_conf(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request
/*
* We may need two file_lock structures for this operation,
* so we get them in advance to avoid races.
*
* In some cases we can be sure, that no new locks will be needed
*/
new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
new_fl2 = locks_alloc_lock();
if (!(request->fl_flags & FL_ACCESS) &&
(request->fl_type != F_UNLCK ||
request->fl_start != 0 || request->fl_end != OFFSET_MAX)) {
new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
new_fl2 = locks_alloc_lock();
}
lock_kernel();
if (request->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {