RDMA/cxgb3: Use AF_INET for sin_family field

Elsewhere the sin_family field holds a value with a name of the form
AF_..., so it seems reasonable to do so here as well.  Also the values
of PF_INET and AF_INET are the same.

The Coccinelle semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:

// <smpl>
@@
struct sockaddr_in sip;
@@

(
sip.sin_family ==
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family !=
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
|
sip.sin_family =
- PF_INET
+ AF_INET
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Amitoj Kaur Chawla 2016-07-04 18:27:45 +05:30 committed by Doug Ledford
parent 56b2eca3fe
commit 3b8fb4b86c

View File

@ -1396,10 +1396,10 @@ static int pass_accept_req(struct t3cdev *tdev, struct sk_buff *skb, void *ctx)
state_set(&child_ep->com, CONNECTING);
child_ep->com.tdev = tdev;
child_ep->com.cm_id = NULL;
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_family = PF_INET;
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_port = req->local_port;
child_ep->com.local_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = req->local_ip;
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_family = PF_INET;
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_port = req->peer_port;
child_ep->com.remote_addr.sin_addr.s_addr = req->peer_ip;
get_ep(&parent_ep->com);