mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-21 08:53:41 +00:00
powerpc: Only obtain cpu_hotplug_lock if called by rtasd
Calling arch_update_cpu_topology from a CPU hotplug state machine callback hits a deadlock because the function tries to get a read lock on cpu_hotplug_lock while the state machine still holds a write lock on it. Since all callers of arch_update_cpu_topology except rtasd already hold cpu_hotplug_lock, this patch changes the function to use stop_machine_cpuslocked and creates a separate function for rtasd which still tries to obtain the lock. Michael Bringmann investigated the bug and provided a detailed analysis of the deadlock on this previous RFC for an alternate solution: Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1497996510-4032-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/771293/
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b3b22507e
commit
3e401f7a2e
@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ extern void __init dump_numa_cpu_topology(void);
|
||||
|
||||
extern int sysfs_add_device_to_node(struct device *dev, int nid);
|
||||
extern void sysfs_remove_device_from_node(struct device *dev, int nid);
|
||||
extern int numa_update_cpu_topology(bool cpus_locked);
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
||||
@ -57,6 +58,11 @@ static inline void sysfs_remove_device_from_node(struct device *dev,
|
||||
int nid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int numa_update_cpu_topology(bool cpus_locked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(CONFIG_NUMA) && defined(CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR)
|
||||
|
@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static void prrn_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
* the RTAS event.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pseries_devicetree_update(-prrn_update_scope);
|
||||
arch_update_cpu_topology();
|
||||
numa_update_cpu_topology(false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static DECLARE_WORK(prrn_work, prrn_work_fn);
|
||||
|
@ -1311,8 +1311,10 @@ static int update_lookup_table(void *data)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Update the node maps and sysfs entries for each cpu whose home node
|
||||
* has changed. Returns 1 when the topology has changed, and 0 otherwise.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* cpus_locked says whether we already hold cpu_hotplug_lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
|
||||
int numa_update_cpu_topology(bool cpus_locked)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int cpu, sibling, changed = 0;
|
||||
struct topology_update_data *updates, *ud;
|
||||
@ -1400,15 +1402,23 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
|
||||
if (!cpumask_weight(&updated_cpus))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
stop_machine(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0], &updated_cpus);
|
||||
if (cpus_locked)
|
||||
stop_machine_cpuslocked(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0],
|
||||
&updated_cpus);
|
||||
else
|
||||
stop_machine(update_cpu_topology, &updates[0], &updated_cpus);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Update the numa-cpu lookup table with the new mappings, even for
|
||||
* offline CPUs. It is best to perform this update from the stop-
|
||||
* machine context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
stop_machine(update_lookup_table, &updates[0],
|
||||
if (cpus_locked)
|
||||
stop_machine_cpuslocked(update_lookup_table, &updates[0],
|
||||
cpumask_of(raw_smp_processor_id()));
|
||||
else
|
||||
stop_machine(update_lookup_table, &updates[0],
|
||||
cpumask_of(raw_smp_processor_id()));
|
||||
|
||||
for (ud = &updates[0]; ud; ud = ud->next) {
|
||||
unregister_cpu_under_node(ud->cpu, ud->old_nid);
|
||||
@ -1426,6 +1436,12 @@ out:
|
||||
return changed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int arch_update_cpu_topology(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
|
||||
return numa_update_cpu_topology(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void topology_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rebuild_sched_domains();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user