FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-15 13:22:55 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

sched: hierarchical load vs find_busiest_group

Browse Source 
find_busiest_group() has some assumptions about task weight being in the
NICE_0_LOAD range. Hierarchical task groups break this assumption - fix this
by replacing it with the average task weight, which will adapt the situation.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Peter Zijlstra 2008-06-27 13:41:28 +02:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent bb3469ac9b
commit 408ed066b1
1 changed files with 23 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
kernel/sched.c
View File

@ -3050,6 +3050,7 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
max_load = this_load = total_load = total_pwr = 0;
busiest_load_per_task = busiest_nr_running = 0;
this_load_per_task = this_nr_running = 0;
if (idle == CPU_NOT_IDLE)
load_idx = sd->busy_idx;
else if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
@ -3064,6 +3065,8 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
int __group_imb = 0;
unsigned int balance_cpu = -1, first_idle_cpu = 0;
unsigned long sum_nr_running, sum_weighted_load;
unsigned long sum_avg_load_per_task;
unsigned long avg_load_per_task;
local_group = cpu_isset(this_cpu, group->cpumask);
@ -3072,6 +3075,8 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
/* Tally up the load of all CPUs in the group */
sum_weighted_load = sum_nr_running = avg_load = 0;
sum_avg_load_per_task = avg_load_per_task = 0;
max_cpu_load = 0;
min_cpu_load = ~0UL;
@ -3105,6 +3110,8 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
avg_load += load;
sum_nr_running += rq->nr_running;
sum_weighted_load += weighted_cpuload(i);
sum_avg_load_per_task += cpu_avg_load_per_task(i);
}
/*
@ -3126,7 +3133,20 @@ find_busiest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, int this_cpu,
avg_load = sg_div_cpu_power(group,
avg_load * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
if ((max_cpu_load - min_cpu_load) > SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
/*
* Consider the group unbalanced when the imbalance is larger
* than the average weight of two tasks.
*
* APZ: with cgroup the avg task weight can vary wildly and
* might not be a suitable number - should we keep a
* normalized nr_running number somewhere that negates
* the hierarchy?
*/
avg_load_per_task = sg_div_cpu_power(group,
sum_avg_load_per_task * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
if ((max_cpu_load - min_cpu_load) > 2*avg_load_per_task)
__group_imb = 1;
group_capacity = group->__cpu_power / SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
@ -3267,9 +3287,9 @@ small_imbalance:
if (busiest_load_per_task > this_load_per_task)
imbn = 1;
} else
this_load_per_task = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
this_load_per_task = cpu_avg_load_per_task(this_cpu);
if (max_load - this_load + SCHED_LOAD_SCALE_FUZZ >=
if (max_load - this_load + 2*busiest_load_per_task >=
busiest_load_per_task * imbn) {
*imbalance = busiest_load_per_task;
return busiest;