mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-14 21:01:29 +00:00
cgroup: kill cgroup_[un]lock()
Now that locking interface is unexported, there's no reason to keep around these thin wrappers. Kill them and use mutex operations directly. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9777cf8d7
commit
47cfcd0922
@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ static inline struct cftype *__d_cft(struct dentry *dentry)
|
||||
* cgroup_lock_live_group - take cgroup_mutex and check that cgrp is alive.
|
||||
* @cgrp: the cgroup to be checked for liveness
|
||||
*
|
||||
* On success, returns true; the lock should be later released with
|
||||
* cgroup_unlock(). On failure returns false with no lock held.
|
||||
* On success, returns true; the mutex should be later unlocked. On
|
||||
* failure returns false with no lock held.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool cgroup_lock_live_group(struct cgroup *cgrp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -819,25 +819,6 @@ static struct cgroup *task_cgroup_from_root(struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
* update of a tasks cgroup pointer by cgroup_attach_task()
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* cgroup_lock - lock out any changes to cgroup structures
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void cgroup_lock(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* cgroup_unlock - release lock on cgroup changes
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Undo the lock taken in a previous cgroup_lock() call.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void cgroup_unlock(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* A couple of forward declarations required, due to cyclic reference loop:
|
||||
* cgroup_mkdir -> cgroup_create -> cgroup_populate_dir ->
|
||||
@ -1967,8 +1948,8 @@ static void cgroup_task_migrate(struct cgroup *oldcgrp,
|
||||
* Call holding cgroup_mutex and the group_rwsem of the leader. Will take
|
||||
* task_lock of @tsk or each thread in the threadgroup individually in turn.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk,
|
||||
bool threadgroup)
|
||||
static int cgroup_attach_task(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *tsk,
|
||||
bool threadgroup)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval, i, group_size;
|
||||
struct cgroup_subsys *ss, *failed_ss = NULL;
|
||||
@ -2191,7 +2172,7 @@ retry_find_task:
|
||||
|
||||
put_task_struct(tsk);
|
||||
out_unlock_cgroup:
|
||||
cgroup_unlock();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2205,7 +2186,7 @@ int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
struct cgroupfs_root *root;
|
||||
int retval = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
cgroup_lock();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
for_each_active_root(root) {
|
||||
struct cgroup *from_cg = task_cgroup_from_root(from, root);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2213,7 +2194,7 @@ int cgroup_attach_task_all(struct task_struct *from, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
||||
if (retval)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
cgroup_unlock();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -2240,7 +2221,7 @@ static int cgroup_release_agent_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cgroup_root_mutex);
|
||||
strcpy(cgrp->root->release_agent_path, buffer);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_root_mutex);
|
||||
cgroup_unlock();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2251,7 +2232,7 @@ static int cgroup_release_agent_show(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
|
||||
return -ENODEV;
|
||||
seq_puts(seq, cgrp->root->release_agent_path);
|
||||
seq_putc(seq, '\n');
|
||||
cgroup_unlock();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3271,9 +3252,9 @@ static void cgroup_transfer_one_task(struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cgroup *new_cgroup = scan->data;
|
||||
|
||||
cgroup_lock();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
cgroup_attach_task(new_cgroup, task, false);
|
||||
cgroup_unlock();
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user