mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 13:00:35 +00:00
x86/numa: Add constraints check for nid parameters
This patch adds constraint checks to the numa_set_distance() function. When the check triggers (this should not happen normally) it emits a warning and avoids a store to a negative index in numa_distance[] array - i.e. avoids memory corruption. Negative ids can be passed when the pxm-to-nids mapping is not properly filled while parsing the SRAT. Signed-off-by: Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20111208121640.GA2229@dhcp-27-244.brq.redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
54c29c635a
commit
54eed6cb16
@ -430,8 +430,9 @@ static int __init numa_alloc_distance(void)
|
||||
* calls are ignored until the distance table is reset with
|
||||
* numa_reset_distance().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If @from or @to is higher than the highest known node at the time of
|
||||
* table creation or @distance doesn't make sense, the call is ignored.
|
||||
* If @from or @to is higher than the highest known node or lower than zero
|
||||
* at the time of table creation or @distance doesn't make sense, the call
|
||||
* is ignored.
|
||||
* This is to allow simplification of specific NUMA config implementations.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
|
||||
@ -439,8 +440,9 @@ void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
|
||||
if (!numa_distance && numa_alloc_distance() < 0)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt) {
|
||||
printk_once(KERN_DEBUG "NUMA: Debug: distance out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
|
||||
if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt ||
|
||||
from < 0 || to < 0) {
|
||||
pr_warn_once("NUMA: Warning: node ids are out of bound, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
|
||||
from, to, distance);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user