FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-22 01:10:28 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

V4L/DVB: em28xx-input: Don't generate one debug message for every get_key read

Browse Source 
Instead of generating one printk for every IR read, prints it only when
count is different from the last count.

While here, as this code is called on every 100ms during the runtime
lifetime, do some performance optimization, assuming that, under normal
circumstances, it is unlikely that the driver would get a new key/key
repeat on every poll.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2010-06-27 08:32:11 -03:00
parent a469585b1c
commit 603044d883
1 changed files with 15 additions and 18 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

33
drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-input.c
View File

@ -292,18 +292,15 @@ static void em28xx_ir_handle_key(struct em28xx_IR *ir)
/* read the registers containing the IR status */
result = ir->get_key(ir, &poll_result);
if (result < 0) {
if (unlikely(result < 0)) {
dprintk("ir->get_key() failed %d\n", result);
return;
}
dprintk("ir->get_key result tb=%02x rc=%02x lr=%02x data=%02x%02x\n",
poll_result.toggle_bit, poll_result.read_count,
ir->last_readcount, poll_result.rc_address,
poll_result.rc_data[0]);
if (poll_result.read_count > 0 &&
poll_result.read_count != ir->last_readcount) {
if (unlikely(poll_result.read_count != ir->last_readcount)) {
dprintk("%s: toggle: %d, count: %d, key 0x%02x%02x\n", __func__,
poll_result.toggle_bit, poll_result.read_count,
poll_result.rc_address, poll_result.rc_data[0]);
if (ir->full_code)
ir_keydown(ir->input,
poll_result.rc_address << 8 |
@ -313,17 +310,17 @@ static void em28xx_ir_handle_key(struct em28xx_IR *ir)
ir_keydown(ir->input,
poll_result.rc_data[0],
poll_result.toggle_bit);
}
if (ir->dev->chip_id == CHIP_ID_EM2874)
/* The em2874 clears the readcount field every time the
register is read. The em2860/2880 datasheet says that it
is supposed to clear the readcount, but it doesn't. So with
the em2874, we are looking for a non-zero read count as
opposed to a readcount that is incrementing */
ir->last_readcount = 0;
else
ir->last_readcount = poll_result.read_count;
if (ir->dev->chip_id == CHIP_ID_EM2874)
/* The em2874 clears the readcount field every time the
register is read. The em2860/2880 datasheet says that it
is supposed to clear the readcount, but it doesn't. So with
the em2874, we are looking for a non-zero read count as
opposed to a readcount that is incrementing */
ir->last_readcount = 0;
else
ir->last_readcount = poll_result.read_count;
}
}
static void em28xx_ir_work(struct work_struct *work)