mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-15 13:22:55 +00:00
Kill cached_lookup() and real_lookup()
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2dd6d1f418
commit
6e6b1bd1e7
153
fs/namei.c
153
fs/namei.c
@ -411,26 +411,6 @@ do_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
return dentry;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Internal lookup() using the new generic dcache.
|
||||
* SMP-safe
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct dentry * cached_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dentry * dentry = __d_lookup(parent, name);
|
||||
|
||||
/* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move()
|
||||
* in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!dentry)
|
||||
dentry = d_lookup(parent, name);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dentry && dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
|
||||
dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
|
||||
|
||||
return dentry;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Short-cut version of permission(), for calling by
|
||||
* path_walk(), when dcache lock is held. Combines parts
|
||||
@ -463,70 +443,6 @@ ok:
|
||||
return security_inode_permission(inode, MAY_EXEC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is called when everything else fails, and we actually have
|
||||
* to go to the low-level filesystem to find out what we should do..
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We get the directory semaphore, and after getting that we also
|
||||
* make sure that nobody added the entry to the dcache in the meantime..
|
||||
* SMP-safe
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct dentry * real_lookup(struct dentry * parent, struct qstr * name, struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dentry * result;
|
||||
struct inode *dir = parent->d_inode;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
|
||||
* while we waited for the directory semaphore..
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
|
||||
* avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker
|
||||
* from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false
|
||||
* negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic
|
||||
* fast walk).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
|
||||
*/
|
||||
result = d_lookup(parent, name);
|
||||
if (!result) {
|
||||
struct dentry *dentry;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
|
||||
result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
||||
if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
dentry = d_alloc(parent, name);
|
||||
result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||
if (dentry) {
|
||||
result = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, dentry, nd);
|
||||
if (result)
|
||||
dput(dentry);
|
||||
else
|
||||
result = dentry;
|
||||
}
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
|
||||
* we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
||||
if (result->d_op && result->d_op->d_revalidate) {
|
||||
result = do_revalidate(result, nd);
|
||||
if (!result)
|
||||
result = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static __always_inline void set_root(struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!nd->root.mnt) {
|
||||
@ -767,7 +683,8 @@ static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
|
||||
struct path *path)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vfsmount *mnt = nd->path.mnt;
|
||||
struct dentry *dentry;
|
||||
struct dentry *dentry, *parent;
|
||||
struct inode *dir;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* See if the low-level filesystem might want
|
||||
* to use its own hash..
|
||||
@ -790,7 +707,59 @@ done:
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
need_lookup:
|
||||
dentry = real_lookup(nd->path.dentry, name, nd);
|
||||
parent = nd->path.dentry;
|
||||
dir = parent->d_inode;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* First re-do the cached lookup just in case it was created
|
||||
* while we waited for the directory semaphore..
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FIXME! This could use version numbering or similar to
|
||||
* avoid unnecessary cache lookups.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The "dcache_lock" is purely to protect the RCU list walker
|
||||
* from concurrent renames at this point (we mustn't get false
|
||||
* negatives from the RCU list walk here, unlike the optimistic
|
||||
* fast walk).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* so doing d_lookup() (with seqlock), instead of lockfree __d_lookup
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dentry = d_lookup(parent, name);
|
||||
if (!dentry) {
|
||||
struct dentry *new;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Don't create child dentry for a dead directory. */
|
||||
dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
||||
if (IS_DEADDIR(dir))
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
new = d_alloc(parent, name);
|
||||
dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||
if (new) {
|
||||
dentry = dir->i_op->lookup(dir, new, nd);
|
||||
if (dentry)
|
||||
dput(new);
|
||||
else
|
||||
dentry = new;
|
||||
}
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(dentry))
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Uhhuh! Nasty case: the cache was re-populated while
|
||||
* we waited on the semaphore. Need to revalidate.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&dir->i_mutex);
|
||||
if (dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate) {
|
||||
dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
|
||||
if (!dentry)
|
||||
dentry = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(dentry))
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
goto done;
|
||||
@ -1144,7 +1113,17 @@ static struct dentry *__lookup_hash(struct qstr *name,
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dentry = cached_lookup(base, name, nd);
|
||||
dentry = __d_lookup(base, name);
|
||||
|
||||
/* lockess __d_lookup may fail due to concurrent d_move()
|
||||
* in some unrelated directory, so try with d_lookup
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!dentry)
|
||||
dentry = d_lookup(base, name);
|
||||
|
||||
if (dentry && dentry->d_op && dentry->d_op->d_revalidate)
|
||||
dentry = do_revalidate(dentry, nd);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dentry) {
|
||||
struct dentry *new;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user