mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-15 05:11:32 +00:00
bpf, arm64: use separate register for state in stxr
Will reported that in BPF_XADD we must use a different register in stxr
instruction for the status flag due to otherwise CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE
behavior per architecture. Reference manual says [1]:
If s == t, then one of the following behaviors must occur:
* The instruction is UNDEFINED.
* The instruction executes as a NOP.
* The instruction performs the store to the specified address, but
the value stored is UNKNOWN.
Thus, use a different temporary register for the status flag to fix it.
Disassembly extract from test 226/STX_XADD_DW from test_bpf.ko:
[...]
0000003c: c85f7d4b ldxr x11, [x10]
00000040: 8b07016b add x11, x11, x7
00000044: c80c7d4b stxr w12, x11, [x10]
00000048: 35ffffac cbnz w12, 0x0000003c
[...]
[1] https://static.docs.arm.com/ddi0487/b/DDI0487B_a_armv8_arm.pdf, p.6132
Fixes: 85f68fe898
("bpf, arm64: implement jiting of BPF_XADD")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e173db36e3
commit
7005cade1b
@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ int bpf_jit_enable __read_mostly;
|
||||
#define TMP_REG_1 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 0)
|
||||
#define TMP_REG_2 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 1)
|
||||
#define TCALL_CNT (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 2)
|
||||
#define TMP_REG_3 (MAX_BPF_JIT_REG + 3)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Map BPF registers to A64 registers */
|
||||
static const int bpf2a64[] = {
|
||||
@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ static const int bpf2a64[] = {
|
||||
/* temporary registers for internal BPF JIT */
|
||||
[TMP_REG_1] = A64_R(10),
|
||||
[TMP_REG_2] = A64_R(11),
|
||||
[TMP_REG_3] = A64_R(12),
|
||||
/* tail_call_cnt */
|
||||
[TCALL_CNT] = A64_R(26),
|
||||
/* temporary register for blinding constants */
|
||||
@ -319,6 +321,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
|
||||
const u8 src = bpf2a64[insn->src_reg];
|
||||
const u8 tmp = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
|
||||
const u8 tmp2 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_2];
|
||||
const u8 tmp3 = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_3];
|
||||
const s16 off = insn->off;
|
||||
const s32 imm = insn->imm;
|
||||
const int i = insn - ctx->prog->insnsi;
|
||||
@ -689,10 +692,10 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
|
||||
emit(A64_PRFM(tmp, PST, L1, STRM), ctx);
|
||||
emit(A64_LDXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp), ctx);
|
||||
emit(A64_ADD(isdw, tmp2, tmp2, src), ctx);
|
||||
emit(A64_STXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp, tmp2), ctx);
|
||||
emit(A64_STXR(isdw, tmp2, tmp, tmp3), ctx);
|
||||
jmp_offset = -3;
|
||||
check_imm19(jmp_offset);
|
||||
emit(A64_CBNZ(0, tmp2, jmp_offset), ctx);
|
||||
emit(A64_CBNZ(0, tmp3, jmp_offset), ctx);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* R0 = ntohx(*(size *)(((struct sk_buff *)R6)->data + imm)) */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user