drm/omap: fix race condition with dev->obj_list

omap_gem_objects are added to dev->obj_list in omap_gem_new, and removed
in omap_gem_free_object. Unfortunately there's no locking for
dev->obj_list, which eventually leads to a crash:

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1123 at lib/list_debug.c:59 __list_del_entry+0xa4/0xe0()
list_del corruption. prev->next should be e9281344, but was ea722b84

Add a spinlock to protect dev->obj_list.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tomi Valkeinen 2014-12-17 14:34:22 +02:00
parent 8519c62ce6
commit 76c4055f2c
3 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -491,6 +491,7 @@ static int dev_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("omapdrm", 0);
spin_lock_init(&priv->list_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->obj_list);
omap_gem_init(dev);

View File

@ -105,6 +105,9 @@ struct omap_drm_private {
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
/* lock for obj_list below */
spinlock_t list_lock;
/* list of GEM objects: */
struct list_head obj_list;

View File

@ -1273,13 +1273,16 @@ unlock:
void omap_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
{
struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev;
struct omap_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
struct omap_gem_object *omap_obj = to_omap_bo(obj);
evict(obj);
WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex));
spin_lock(&priv->list_lock);
list_del(&omap_obj->mm_list);
spin_unlock(&priv->list_lock);
drm_gem_free_mmap_offset(obj);
@ -1377,7 +1380,9 @@ struct drm_gem_object *omap_gem_new(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!omap_obj)
goto fail;
spin_lock(&priv->list_lock);
list_add(&omap_obj->mm_list, &priv->obj_list);
spin_unlock(&priv->list_lock);
obj = &omap_obj->base;