mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-16 14:02:10 +00:00
unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue
Currently, peeking on a unix stream socket with an offset larger than len of the data in the sk receive queue returns immediately with bogus data. This patch fixes this so that the behavior is the same as peeking with no offset on an empty queue: the caller blocks. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
39cc86130b
commit
79f632c71b
@ -1859,10 +1859,10 @@ out:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Sleep until data has arrive. But check for races..
|
||||
* Sleep until more data has arrived. But check for races..
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static long unix_stream_data_wait(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
|
||||
static long unix_stream_data_wait(struct sock *sk, long timeo,
|
||||
struct sk_buff *last)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ static long unix_stream_data_wait(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) ||
|
||||
if (skb_peek_tail(&sk->sk_receive_queue) != last ||
|
||||
sk->sk_err ||
|
||||
(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
|
||||
signal_pending(current) ||
|
||||
@ -1890,8 +1890,6 @@ static long unix_stream_data_wait(struct sock *sk, long timeo)
|
||||
return timeo;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
|
||||
struct msghdr *msg, size_t size,
|
||||
int flags)
|
||||
@ -1936,14 +1934,12 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
int chunk;
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb, *last;
|
||||
|
||||
unix_state_lock(sk);
|
||||
skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
|
||||
last = skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
|
||||
again:
|
||||
if (skb == NULL) {
|
||||
unix_sk(sk)->recursion_level = 0;
|
||||
@ -1966,7 +1962,7 @@ again:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&u->readlock);
|
||||
|
||||
timeo = unix_stream_data_wait(sk, timeo);
|
||||
timeo = unix_stream_data_wait(sk, timeo, last);
|
||||
|
||||
if (signal_pending(current)
|
||||
|| mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock)) {
|
||||
@ -1980,10 +1976,13 @@ again:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (skip >= skb->len) {
|
||||
skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
|
||||
while (skip >= skb->len) {
|
||||
skip -= skb->len;
|
||||
last = skb;
|
||||
skb = skb_peek_next(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
if (!skb)
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unix_state_unlock(sk);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user