FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2025-01-10 19:43:29 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

netfilter: x_tables: don't reject valid target size on some architectures

Browse Source 
Quoting John Stultz:
  In updating a 32bit arm device from 4.6 to Linus' current HEAD, I
  noticed I was having some trouble with networking, and realized that
  /proc/net/ip_tables_names was suddenly empty.
  Digging through the registration process, it seems we're catching on the:

   if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
       target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
         return -EINVAL;

  Where next_offset seems to be 4 bytes larger then the
  offset + standard_target struct size.

next_offset needs to be aligned via XT_ALIGN (so we can access all members
of ip(6)t_entry struct).

This problem didn't show up on i686 as it only needs 4-byte alignment for
u64, but iptables userspace on other 32bit arches does insert extra padding.

Reported-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Tested-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Fixes: 7ed2abddd20cf ("netfilter: x_tables: check standard target size too")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This commit is contained in:
Florian Westphal 2016-06-01 02:04:44 +02:00 committed by Pablo Neira Ayuso
parent 14b84e8654
commit 7b7eba0f35
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
net/netfilter/x_tables.c
View File

@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ int xt_compat_check_entry_offsets(const void *base, const char *elems,
return -EINVAL;
if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
target_offset + sizeof(struct compat_xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
COMPAT_XT_ALIGN(target_offset + sizeof(struct compat_xt_standard_target)) != next_offset)
return -EINVAL;
/* compat_xt_entry match has less strict aligment requirements,
@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ int xt_check_entry_offsets(const void *base,
return -EINVAL;
if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, XT_STANDARD_TARGET) == 0 &&
target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target) != next_offset)
XT_ALIGN(target_offset + sizeof(struct xt_standard_target)) != next_offset)
return -EINVAL;
return xt_check_entry_match(elems, base + target_offset,