mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-23 18:07:03 +00:00
mmc: block: introduce new_areq and old_areq
Recycling the same variable in an x=x+1 fashion may seem clever here but it makes the code terse and hard to follow for humans. Introduce a new_areq and old_areq variable so we see what is going on. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
da0dbaffe3
commit
7d552a4808
@ -1634,7 +1634,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
|
||||
enum mmc_blk_status status;
|
||||
struct mmc_queue_req *mq_rq;
|
||||
struct request *req;
|
||||
struct mmc_async_req *areq;
|
||||
struct mmc_async_req *new_areq;
|
||||
struct mmc_async_req *old_areq;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rqc && !mq->mqrq_prev->req)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -1654,11 +1655,12 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(mq->mqrq_cur, card, 0, mq);
|
||||
areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
|
||||
new_areq = &mq->mqrq_cur->mmc_active;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
areq = NULL;
|
||||
areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, areq, &status);
|
||||
if (!areq) {
|
||||
new_areq = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
old_areq = mmc_start_req(card->host, new_areq, &status);
|
||||
if (!old_areq) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We have just put the first request into the pipeline
|
||||
* and there is nothing more to do until it is
|
||||
@ -1673,7 +1675,7 @@ static int mmc_blk_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *rqc)
|
||||
* An asynchronous request has been completed and we proceed
|
||||
* to handle the result of it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mq_rq = container_of(areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
|
||||
mq_rq = container_of(old_areq, struct mmc_queue_req, mmc_active);
|
||||
brq = &mq_rq->brq;
|
||||
req = mq_rq->req;
|
||||
type = rq_data_dir(req) == READ ? MMC_BLK_READ : MMC_BLK_WRITE;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user