mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2025-01-04 00:01:44 +00:00
ext4: check for allocation block validity with block group locked
With commit 044e6e3d74
: "ext4: don't update checksum of new
initialized bitmaps" the buffer valid bit will get set without
actually setting up the checksum for the allocation bitmap, since the
checksum will get calculated once we actually allocate an inode or
block.
If we are doing this, then we need to (re-)check the verified bit
after we take the block group lock. Otherwise, we could race with
another process reading and verifying the bitmap, which would then
complain about the checksum being invalid.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1780137
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
362eca70b5
commit
8d5a803c6a
@ -368,6 +368,8 @@ static int ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
|
||||
|
||||
ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
|
||||
if (buffer_verified(bh))
|
||||
goto verified;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify(sb, block_group,
|
||||
desc, bh))) {
|
||||
ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
|
||||
@ -386,6 +388,7 @@ static int ext4_validate_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
set_buffer_verified(bh);
|
||||
verified:
|
||||
ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ static int ext4_validate_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
return -EFSCORRUPTED;
|
||||
|
||||
ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
|
||||
if (buffer_verified(bh))
|
||||
goto verified;
|
||||
blk = ext4_inode_bitmap(sb, desc);
|
||||
if (!ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_verify(sb, block_group, desc, bh,
|
||||
EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8)) {
|
||||
@ -101,6 +103,7 @@ static int ext4_validate_inode_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
|
||||
return -EFSBADCRC;
|
||||
}
|
||||
set_buffer_verified(bh);
|
||||
verified:
|
||||
ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user