FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-14 21:01:29 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs/memory-barriers.txt: Update I/O section to be clearer about CPU vs thread

Browse Source 
The revised I/O ordering section of memory-barriers.txt introduced in
4614bbdee3 ("docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER
EFFECTS" section") loosely refers to "the CPU", whereas the ordering
guarantees generally apply within a thread of execution that can migrate
between cores, with the scheduler providing the relevant barrier
semantics.

Reword the section to refer to "CPU thread" and call out ordering of
MMIO writes separately from ordering of writes to memory. Ben also
spotted that the string accessors are native-endian, so fix that up too.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/080d1ec73e3e29d6ffeeeb50b39b613da28afb37.camel@kernel.crashing.org
Fixes: 4614bbdee3 ("docs/memory-barriers.txt: Rewrite "KERNEL I/O BARRIER EFFECTS" section")
Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Will Deacon 2019-04-12 13:42:18 +01:00
parent 0cde62a46e
commit 9726840d9c
1 changed files with 37 additions and 24 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

61
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
View File

@ -2523,27 +2523,37 @@ guarantees:
ioremap()), the ordering guarantees are as follows:
1. All readX() and writeX() accesses to the same peripheral are ordered
with respect to each other. This ensures that MMIO register writes by
the CPU to a particular device will arrive in program order.
with respect to each other. This ensures that MMIO register accesses
by the same CPU thread to a particular device will arrive in program
order.
2. A writeX() by the CPU to the peripheral will first wait for the
completion of all prior CPU writes to memory. This ensures that
writes by the CPU to an outbound DMA buffer allocated by
dma_alloc_coherent() will be visible to a DMA engine when the CPU
writes to its MMIO control register to trigger the transfer.
2. A writeX() issued by a CPU thread holding a spinlock is ordered
before a writeX() to the same peripheral from another CPU thread
issued after a later acquisition of the same spinlock. This ensures
that MMIO register writes to a particular device issued while holding
a spinlock will arrive in an order consistent with acquisitions of
the lock.
3. A readX() by the CPU from the peripheral will complete before any
subsequent CPU reads from memory can begin. This ensures that reads
by the CPU from an incoming DMA buffer allocated by
dma_alloc_coherent() will not see stale data after reading from the
DMA engine's MMIO status register to establish that the DMA transfer
has completed.
3. A writeX() by a CPU thread to the peripheral will first wait for the
completion of all prior writes to memory either issued by, or
propagated to, the same thread. This ensures that writes by the CPU
to an outbound DMA buffer allocated by dma_alloc_coherent() will be
visible to a DMA engine when the CPU writes to its MMIO control
register to trigger the transfer.
4. A readX() by the CPU from the peripheral will complete before any
subsequent delay() loop can begin execution. This ensures that two
MMIO register writes by the CPU to a peripheral will arrive at least
1us apart if the first write is immediately read back with readX()
and udelay(1) is called prior to the second writeX():
4. A readX() by a CPU thread from the peripheral will complete before
any subsequent reads from memory by the same thread can begin. This
ensures that reads by the CPU from an incoming DMA buffer allocated
by dma_alloc_coherent() will not see stale data after reading from
the DMA engine's MMIO status register to establish that the DMA
transfer has completed.
5. A readX() by a CPU thread from the peripheral will complete before
any subsequent delay() loop can begin execution on the same thread.
This ensures that two MMIO register writes by the CPU to a peripheral
will arrive at least 1us apart if the first write is immediately read
back with readX() and udelay(1) is called prior to the second
writeX():
writel(42, DEVICE_REGISTER_0); // Arrives at the device...
readl(DEVICE_REGISTER_0);
@ -2559,10 +2569,11 @@ guarantees:
These are similar to readX() and writeX(), but provide weaker memory
ordering guarantees. Specifically, they do not guarantee ordering with
respect to normal memory accesses or delay() loops (i.e. bullets 2-4
above) but they are still guaranteed to be ordered with respect to other
accesses to the same peripheral when operating on __iomem pointers
mapped with the default I/O attributes.
respect to locking, normal memory accesses or delay() loops (i.e.
bullets 2-5 above) but they are still guaranteed to be ordered with
respect to other accesses from the same CPU thread to the same
peripheral when operating on __iomem pointers mapped with the default
I/O attributes.
(*) readsX(), writesX():
@ -2600,8 +2611,10 @@ guarantees:
These will perform appropriately for the type of access they're actually
doing, be it inX()/outX() or readX()/writeX().
All of these accessors assume that the underlying peripheral is little-endian,
and will therefore perform byte-swapping operations on big-endian architectures.
With the exception of the string accessors (insX(), outsX(), readsX() and
writesX()), all of the above assume that the underlying peripheral is
little-endian and will therefore perform byte-swapping operations on big-endian
architectures.
========================================