mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-26 11:28:28 +00:00
mm: drop hotplug lock from lru_add_drain_all()
Pulling cpu hotplug locks inside the mm core function like
lru_add_drain_all just asks for problems and the recent lockdep splat
[1] just proves this. While the usage in that particular case might be
wrong we should avoid the locking as lru_add_drain_all() is used in many
places. It seems that this is not all that hard to achieve actually.
We have done the same thing for drain_all_pages which is analogous by
commit a459eeb7b8
("mm, page_alloc: do not depend on cpu hotplug locks
inside the allocator"). All we have to care about is to handle
- the work item might be executed on a different cpu in worker from
unbound pool so it doesn't run on pinned on the cpu
- we have to make sure that we do not race with page_alloc_cpu_dead
calling lru_add_drain_cpu
the first part is already handled because the worker calls lru_add_drain
which disables preemption when calling lru_add_drain_cpu on the local
cpu it is draining. The later is true because page_alloc_cpu_dead is
called on the controlling CPU after the hotplugged CPU vanished
completely.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/089e0825eec8955c1f055c83d476@google.com
[add a cpu hotplug locking interaction as per tglx]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171116120535.23765-1-mhocko@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0486a38bcc
commit
9852a72123
@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ extern void mark_page_accessed(struct page *);
|
||||
extern void lru_add_drain(void);
|
||||
extern void lru_add_drain_cpu(int cpu);
|
||||
extern void lru_add_drain_all(void);
|
||||
extern void lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked(void);
|
||||
extern void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page);
|
||||
extern void deactivate_file_page(struct page *page);
|
||||
extern void mark_page_lazyfree(struct page *page);
|
||||
|
@ -1637,7 +1637,7 @@ repeat:
|
||||
goto failed_removal;
|
||||
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked();
|
||||
lru_add_drain_all();
|
||||
drain_all_pages(zone);
|
||||
|
||||
pfn = scan_movable_pages(start_pfn, end_pfn);
|
||||
|
16
mm/swap.c
16
mm/swap.c
@ -688,7 +688,14 @@ static void lru_add_drain_per_cpu(struct work_struct *dummy)
|
||||
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct work_struct, lru_add_drain_work);
|
||||
|
||||
void lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked(void)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Doesn't need any cpu hotplug locking because we do rely on per-cpu
|
||||
* kworkers being shut down before our page_alloc_cpu_dead callback is
|
||||
* executed on the offlined cpu.
|
||||
* Calling this function with cpu hotplug locks held can actually lead
|
||||
* to obscure indirect dependencies via WQ context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void lru_add_drain_all(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(lock);
|
||||
static struct cpumask has_work;
|
||||
@ -724,13 +731,6 @@ void lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked(void)
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void lru_add_drain_all(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
get_online_cpus();
|
||||
lru_add_drain_all_cpuslocked();
|
||||
put_online_cpus();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* release_pages - batched put_page()
|
||||
* @pages: array of pages to release
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user