FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-14 12:49:08 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Revert "mm, thp: restore node-local hugepage allocations"

Browse Source 
This reverts commit 2f0799a0ff ("mm, thp: restore node-local
hugepage allocations").

commit 2f0799a0ff was rightfully applied to avoid the risk of a
severe regression that was reported by the kernel test robot at the end
of the merge window.  Now we understood the regression was a false
positive and was caused by a significant increase in fairness during a
swap trashing benchmark.  So it's safe to re-apply the fix and continue
improving the code from there.  The benchmark that reported the
regression is very useful, but it provides a meaningful result only when
there is no significant alteration in fairness during the workload.  The
removal of __GFP_THISNODE increased fairness.

__GFP_THISNODE cannot be used in the generic page faults path for new
memory allocations under the MPOL_DEFAULT mempolicy, or the allocation
behavior significantly deviates from what the MPOL_DEFAULT semantics are
supposed to be for THP and 4k allocations alike.

Setting THP defrag to "always" or using MADV_HUGEPAGE (with THP defrag
set to "madvise") has never meant to provide an implicit MPOL_BIND on
the "current" node the task is running on, causing swap storms and
providing a much more aggressive behavior than even zone_reclaim_node =
3.

Any workload who could have benefited from __GFP_THISNODE has now to
enable zone_reclaim_mode=1||2||3.  __GFP_THISNODE implicitly provided
the zone_reclaim_mode behavior, but it only did so if THP was enabled:
if THP was disabled, there would have been no chance to get any 4k page
from the current node if the current node was full of pagecache, which
further shows how this __GFP_THISNODE was misplaced in MADV_HUGEPAGE.
MADV_HUGEPAGE has never been intended to provide any zone_reclaim_mode
semantics, in fact the two are orthogonal, zone_reclaim_mode = 1|2|3
must work exactly the same with MADV_HUGEPAGE set or not.

The performance characteristic of memory depends on the hardware
details.  The numbers below are obtained on Naples/EPYC architecture and
the N/A projection extends them to show what we should aim for in the
future as a good THP NUMA locality default.  The benchmark used
exercises random memory seeks (note: the cost of the page faults is not
part of the measurement).

  D0 THP | D0 4k | D1 THP | D1 4k | D2 THP | D2 4k | D3 THP | D3 4k | ...
  0%     | +43%  | +45%   | +106% | +131%  | +224% | N/A    | N/A

D0 means distance zero (i.e.  local memory), D1 means distance one (i.e.
intra socket memory), D2 means distance two (i.e.  inter socket memory),
etc...

For the guest physical memory allocated by qemu and for guest mode
kernel the performance characteristic of RAM is more complex and an
ideal default could be:

  D0 THP | D1 THP | D0 4k | D2 THP | D1 4k | D3 THP | D2 4k | D3 4k | ...
  0%     | +58%   | +101% | N/A    | +222% | N/A    | N/A   | N/A

NOTE: the N/A are projections and haven't been measured yet, the
measurement in this case is done on a 1950x with only two NUMA nodes.
The THP case here means THP was used both in the host and in the guest.

After applying this commit the THP NUMA locality order that we'll get
out of MADV_HUGEPAGE is this:

  D0 THP | D1 THP | D2 THP | D3 THP | ... | D0 4k | D1 4k | D2 4k | D3 4k | ...

Before this commit it was:

  D0 THP | D0 4k | D1 4k | D2 4k | D3 4k | ...

Even if we ignore the breakage of large workloads that can't fit in a
single node that the __GFP_THISNODE implicit "current node" mbind
caused, the THP NUMA locality order provided by __GFP_THISNODE was still
not the one we shall aim for in the long term (i.e.  the first one at
the top).

After this commit is applied, we can introduce a new allocator multi
order API and to replace those two alloc_pages_vmas calls in the page
fault path, with a single multi order call:

        unsigned int order = (1 << HPAGE_PMD_ORDER) | (1 << 0);
        page = alloc_pages_multi_order(..., &order);
        if (!page)
        	goto out;
        if (!(order & (1 << 0))) {
        	VM_WARN_ON(order != 1 << HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
        	/* THP fault */
        } else {
        	VM_WARN_ON(order != 1 << 0);
        	/* 4k fallback */
        }

The page allocator logic has to be altered so that when it fails on any
zone with order 9, it has to try again with a order 0 before falling
back to the next zone in the zonelist.

After that we need to do more measurements and evaluate if adding an
opt-in feature for guest mode is worth it, to swap "DN 4k | DN+1 THP"
with "DN+1 THP | DN 4k" at every NUMA distance crossing.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190503223146.2312-3-aarcange@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu>
Cc: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Andrea Arcangeli 2019-08-13 15:37:53 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 92717d429b
commit a8282608c8
3 changed files with 29 additions and 17 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
include/linux/mempolicy.h
View File

@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ struct mempolicy *mpol_shared_policy_lookup(struct shared_policy *sp,
struct mempolicy *get_task_policy(struct task_struct *p);
struct mempolicy *__get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr);
struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr);
bool vma_policy_mof(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
extern void numa_default_policy(void);

42
mm/huge_memory.c
View File

@ -647,27 +647,37 @@ release:
static inline gfp_t alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
{
const bool vma_madvised = !!(vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE);
const gfp_t gfp_mask = GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT | __GFP_THISNODE;
gfp_t this_node = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
struct mempolicy *pol;
/*
* __GFP_THISNODE is used only when __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not
* specified, to express a general desire to stay on the current
* node for optimistic allocation attempts. If the defrag mode
* and/or madvise hint requires the direct reclaim then we prefer
* to fallback to other node rather than node reclaim because that
* can lead to excessive reclaim even though there is free memory
* on other nodes. We expect that NUMA preferences are specified
* by memory policies.
*/
pol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr);
if (pol->mode != MPOL_BIND)
this_node = __GFP_THISNODE;
mpol_cond_put(pol);
#endif
/* Always do synchronous compaction */
if (test_bit(TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_DIRECT_FLAG, &transparent_hugepage_flags))
return GFP_TRANSHUGE | __GFP_THISNODE |
(vma_madvised ? 0 : __GFP_NORETRY);
/* Kick kcompactd and fail quickly */
return GFP_TRANSHUGE | (vma_madvised ? 0 : __GFP_NORETRY);
if (test_bit(TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_KSWAPD_FLAG, &transparent_hugepage_flags))
return gfp_mask | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM;
/* Synchronous compaction if madvised, otherwise kick kcompactd */
return GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM | this_node;
if (test_bit(TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_KSWAPD_OR_MADV_FLAG, &transparent_hugepage_flags))
return gfp_mask | (vma_madvised ? __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM :
__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM);
/* Only do synchronous compaction if madvised */
return GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT | (vma_madvised ? __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM :
__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM | this_node);
if (test_bit(TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_REQ_MADV_FLAG, &transparent_hugepage_flags))
return gfp_mask | (vma_madvised ? __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM : 0);
return gfp_mask;
return GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT | (vma_madvised ? __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM :
this_node);
return GFP_TRANSHUGE_LIGHT | this_node;
}
/* Caller must hold page table lock. */

2
mm/mempolicy.c
View File

@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ struct mempolicy *__get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* freeing by another task. It is the caller's responsibility to free the
* extra reference for shared policies.
*/
static struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr)
{
struct mempolicy *pol = __get_vma_policy(vma, addr);