[ARM] omap: remove unnecessary calls to propagate_rate()

We've always called propagate_rate() in the parent function to
the .set_rate methods, so there's no point having the .set_rate
methods also call this heavy-weight function - it's mere
duplication of what's happening elsewhere.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Russell King 2008-11-13 13:07:00 +00:00 committed by Russell King
parent c6af450852
commit a9e8820963

View File

@ -308,7 +308,6 @@ static int omap1_select_table_rate(struct clk * clk, unsigned long rate)
omap_sram_reprogram_clock(ptr->dpllctl_val, ptr->ckctl_val);
ck_dpll1.rate = ptr->pll_rate;
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
return 0;
}
@ -333,9 +332,6 @@ static int omap1_clk_set_rate_dsp_domain(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
ret = 0;
}
if (unlikely(ret == 0 && (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES)))
propagate_rate(clk);
return ret;
}
@ -442,8 +438,6 @@ static int omap1_set_sossi_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
omap_writel(l, MOD_CONF_CTRL_1);
clk->rate = p_rate / (div + 1);
if (unlikely(clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES))
propagate_rate(clk);
return 0;
}
@ -787,7 +781,6 @@ int __init omap1_clk_init(void)
}
}
}
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
#else
/* Find the highest supported frequency and enable it */
if (omap1_select_table_rate(&virtual_ck_mpu, ~0)) {
@ -796,9 +789,9 @@ int __init omap1_clk_init(void)
omap_writew(0x2290, DPLL_CTL);
omap_writew(cpu_is_omap730() ? 0x3005 : 0x1005, ARM_CKCTL);
ck_dpll1.rate = 60000000;
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
}
#endif
propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1);
/* Cache rates for clocks connected to ck_ref (not dpll1) */
propagate_rate(&ck_ref);
printk(KERN_INFO "Clocking rate (xtal/DPLL1/MPU): "