mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2025-02-06 11:19:56 +00:00
mtd: lpc32xx: drop bitflip_threshold initialization
These drivers don't need to explicitly initialize their bitflip thresholds. The comment is no longer correct, since nand_scan_tail() performs this initialization as of the following commit: commit ea3b2ea24ef0f2ef9c6795b19cff456195b6728a Author: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@jungo.com> Date: Fri Jun 8 18:29:06 2012 +0300 mtd: nand: initialize bitflip_threshold prior to BBT scanning (It seems there were some parallel efforts on writing/submitting these drivers, and Shmulik's bug fix.) Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7171511eae
commit
adddcac0a2
@ -721,12 +721,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
nand_chip->bbt_td = &lpc32xx_nand_bbt;
|
||||
nand_chip->bbt_md = &lpc32xx_nand_bbt_mirror;
|
||||
|
||||
/* bitflip_threshold's default is defined as ecc_strength anyway.
|
||||
* Unfortunately, it is set only later at add_mtd_device(). Meanwhile
|
||||
* being 0, it causes bad block table scanning errors in
|
||||
* nand_scan_tail(), so preparing it here. */
|
||||
mtd->bitflip_threshold = nand_chip->ecc.strength;
|
||||
|
||||
if (use_dma) {
|
||||
res = lpc32xx_dma_setup(host);
|
||||
if (res) {
|
||||
|
@ -840,12 +840,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
chip->ecc.strength = 1;
|
||||
chip->ecc.hwctl = lpc32xx_nand_ecc_enable;
|
||||
|
||||
/* bitflip_threshold's default is defined as ecc_strength anyway.
|
||||
* Unfortunately, it is set only later at add_mtd_device(). Meanwhile
|
||||
* being 0, it causes bad block table scanning errors in
|
||||
* nand_scan_tail(), so preparing it here already. */
|
||||
mtd->bitflip_threshold = chip->ecc.strength;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Allocate a large enough buffer for a single huge page plus
|
||||
* extra space for the spare area and ECC storage area
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user