mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-04 14:10:46 +00:00
scsi: libfc: Avoid invoking response handler twice if ep is already completed
A race condition exists between the response handler getting called because of exchange_mgr_reset() (which clears out all the active XIDs) and the response we get via an interrupt. Sequence of events: rport ba0200: Port timeout, state PLOGI rport ba0200: Port entered PLOGI state from PLOGI state xid 1052: Exchange timer armed : 20000 msecs xid timer armed here rport ba0200: Received LOGO request while in state PLOGI rport ba0200: Delete port rport ba0200: work event 3 rport ba0200: lld callback ev 3 bnx2fc: rport_event_hdlr: event = 3, port_id = 0xba0200 bnx2fc: ba0200 - rport not created Yet!! /* Here we reset any outstanding exchanges before freeing rport using the exch_mgr_reset() */ xid 1052: Exchange timer canceled /* Here we got two responses for one xid */ xid 1052: invoking resp(), esb 20000000 state 3 xid 1052: invoking resp(), esb 20000000 state 3 xid 1052: fc_rport_plogi_resp() : ep->resp_active 2 xid 1052: fc_rport_plogi_resp() : ep->resp_active 2 Skip the response if the exchange is already completed. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201215194731.2326-1-jhasan@marvell.com Signed-off-by: Javed Hasan <jhasan@marvell.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
72eeb7c715
commit
b2b0f16fa6
@ -1623,8 +1623,13 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp)
|
||||
rc = fc_exch_done_locked(ep);
|
||||
WARN_ON(fc_seq_exch(sp) != ep);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
|
||||
if (!rc)
|
||||
if (!rc) {
|
||||
fc_exch_delete(ep);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
FC_EXCH_DBG(ep, "ep is completed already,"
|
||||
"hence skip calling the resp\n");
|
||||
goto skip_resp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1643,6 +1648,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp)
|
||||
if (!fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp))
|
||||
fc_frame_free(fp);
|
||||
|
||||
skip_resp:
|
||||
fc_exch_release(ep);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
rel:
|
||||
@ -1899,10 +1905,16 @@ static void fc_exch_reset(struct fc_exch *ep)
|
||||
|
||||
fc_exch_hold(ep);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rc)
|
||||
if (!rc) {
|
||||
fc_exch_delete(ep);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
FC_EXCH_DBG(ep, "ep is completed already,"
|
||||
"hence skip calling the resp\n");
|
||||
goto skip_resp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, ERR_PTR(-FC_EX_CLOSED));
|
||||
skip_resp:
|
||||
fc_seq_set_resp(sp, NULL, ep->arg);
|
||||
fc_exch_release(ep);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user