mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-20 00:11:22 +00:00
USB: xhci: Performance - move xhci_work() into xhci_irq()
When we move xhci_work() into xhci_irq(), we don't need to read the operational register status field twice. Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9032cd5279
commit
bda531452c
@ -2030,48 +2030,6 @@ void xhci_handle_event(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
|
||||
/* Are there more items on the event ring? */
|
||||
xhci_handle_event(xhci);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Called in interrupt context when there might be work
|
||||
* queued on the event ring
|
||||
*
|
||||
* xhci->lock must be held by caller.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void xhci_work(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 temp;
|
||||
u64 temp_64;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Clear the op reg interrupt status first,
|
||||
* so we can receive interrupts from other MSI-X interrupters.
|
||||
* Write 1 to clear the interrupt status.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
temp = xhci_readl(xhci, &xhci->op_regs->status);
|
||||
temp |= STS_EINT;
|
||||
xhci_writel(xhci, temp, &xhci->op_regs->status);
|
||||
/* FIXME when MSI-X is supported and there are multiple vectors */
|
||||
/* Clear the MSI-X event interrupt status */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Acknowledge the interrupt */
|
||||
temp = xhci_readl(xhci, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
|
||||
temp |= 0x3;
|
||||
xhci_writel(xhci, temp, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
|
||||
|
||||
if (xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_DYING)
|
||||
xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI dying, ignoring interrupt. "
|
||||
"Shouldn't IRQs be disabled?\n");
|
||||
else
|
||||
/* FIXME this should be a delayed service routine
|
||||
* that clears the EHB.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
xhci_handle_event(xhci);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Clear the event handler busy flag (RW1C); event ring is empty. */
|
||||
temp_64 = xhci_read_64(xhci, &xhci->ir_set->erst_dequeue);
|
||||
xhci_write_64(xhci, temp_64 | ERST_EHB, &xhci->ir_set->erst_dequeue);
|
||||
/* Flush posted writes -- FIXME is this necessary? */
|
||||
xhci_readl(xhci, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* xHCI spec says we can get an interrupt, and if the HC has an error condition,
|
||||
@ -2083,6 +2041,7 @@ irqreturn_t xhci_irq(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
|
||||
struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
|
||||
u32 temp, temp2;
|
||||
union xhci_trb *trb;
|
||||
u64 temp_64;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&xhci->lock);
|
||||
trb = xhci->event_ring->dequeue;
|
||||
@ -2117,7 +2076,35 @@ hw_died:
|
||||
return -ESHUTDOWN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
xhci_work(xhci);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Clear the op reg interrupt status first,
|
||||
* so we can receive interrupts from other MSI-X interrupters.
|
||||
* Write 1 to clear the interrupt status.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
temp |= STS_EINT;
|
||||
xhci_writel(xhci, temp, &xhci->op_regs->status);
|
||||
/* FIXME when MSI-X is supported and there are multiple vectors */
|
||||
/* Clear the MSI-X event interrupt status */
|
||||
|
||||
/* Acknowledge the interrupt */
|
||||
temp = xhci_readl(xhci, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
|
||||
temp |= 0x3;
|
||||
xhci_writel(xhci, temp, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
|
||||
|
||||
if (xhci->xhc_state & XHCI_STATE_DYING)
|
||||
xhci_dbg(xhci, "xHCI dying, ignoring interrupt. "
|
||||
"Shouldn't IRQs be disabled?\n");
|
||||
else
|
||||
/* FIXME this should be a delayed service routine
|
||||
* that clears the EHB.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
xhci_handle_event(xhci);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Clear the event handler busy flag (RW1C); event ring is empty. */
|
||||
temp_64 = xhci_read_64(xhci, &xhci->ir_set->erst_dequeue);
|
||||
xhci_write_64(xhci, temp_64 | ERST_EHB, &xhci->ir_set->erst_dequeue);
|
||||
/* Flush posted writes -- FIXME is this necessary? */
|
||||
xhci_readl(xhci, &xhci->ir_set->irq_pending);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&xhci->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return IRQ_HANDLED;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user