mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-15 21:30:43 +00:00
Merge branch 'rcu/urgent' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu
Pull RCU fixes from Paul McKenney: "I must confess that this past merge window was not RCU's best showing. This series contains three more fixes for RCU regressions: 1. A fix to __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU() that causes it to act as an interrupt from idle rather than as a task switch from idle. This change is needed due to the recent use of _rcuidle() tracepoints that can be invoked from interrupt handlers as well as from idle. Without this fix, invoking _rcuidle() tracepoints from interrupt handlers results in splats and (more seriously) confusion on RCU's part as to whether a given CPU is idle or not. This confusion can in turn result in too-short grace periods and therefore random memory corruption. 2. A fix to a subtle deadlock that could result due to RCU doing a wakeup while holding one of its rcu_node structure's locks. Although the probability of occurrence is low, it really does happen. The fix, courtesy of Steven Rostedt, uses irq_work_queue() to avoid the deadlock. 3. A fix to a silent deadlock (invisible to lockdep) due to the interaction of timeouts posted by RCU debug code enabled by CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY=y, grace-period initialization, and CPU hotplug operations. This will not occur in production kernels, but really does occur in randconfig testing. Diagnosis courtesy of Steven Rostedt" * 'rcu/urgent' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu: rcu: Fix deadlock with CPU hotplug, RCU GP init, and timer migration rcu: Don't call wakeup() with rcu_node structure ->lock held trace: Allow idle-safe tracepoints to be called from irq
This commit is contained in:
commit
cb7e9704d5
@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ static inline void tracepoint_synchronize_unregister(void)
|
||||
TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
|
||||
TP_ARGS(data_args), \
|
||||
TP_CONDITION(cond), \
|
||||
rcu_idle_exit(), \
|
||||
rcu_idle_enter()); \
|
||||
rcu_irq_enter(), \
|
||||
rcu_irq_exit()); \
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args)
|
||||
|
@ -431,6 +431,7 @@ choice
|
||||
config TREE_RCU
|
||||
bool "Tree-based hierarchical RCU"
|
||||
depends on !PREEMPT && SMP
|
||||
select IRQ_WORK
|
||||
help
|
||||
This option selects the RCU implementation that is
|
||||
designed for very large SMP system with hundreds or
|
||||
|
@ -1451,9 +1451,9 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
|
||||
rnp->grphi, rnp->qsmask);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY
|
||||
if ((prandom_u32() % (rcu_num_nodes * 8)) == 0 &&
|
||||
if ((prandom_u32() % (rcu_num_nodes + 1)) == 0 &&
|
||||
system_state == SYSTEM_RUNNING)
|
||||
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(2);
|
||||
udelay(200);
|
||||
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY */
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1613,6 +1613,14 @@ static int __noreturn rcu_gp_kthread(void *arg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void rsp_wakeup(struct irq_work *work)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rcu_state *rsp = container_of(work, struct rcu_state, wakeup_work);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wake up rcu_gp_kthread() to start the grace period. */
|
||||
wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Start a new RCU grace period if warranted, re-initializing the hierarchy
|
||||
* in preparation for detecting the next grace period. The caller must hold
|
||||
@ -1637,8 +1645,12 @@ rcu_start_gp_advanced(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
|
||||
}
|
||||
rsp->gp_flags = RCU_GP_FLAG_INIT;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Wake up rcu_gp_kthread() to start the grace period. */
|
||||
wake_up(&rsp->gp_wq);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can't do wakeups while holding the rnp->lock, as that
|
||||
* could cause possible deadlocks with the rq->lock. Deter
|
||||
* the wakeup to interrupt context.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
irq_work_queue(&rsp->wakeup_work);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -3235,6 +3247,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
|
||||
|
||||
rsp->rda = rda;
|
||||
init_waitqueue_head(&rsp->gp_wq);
|
||||
init_irq_work(&rsp->wakeup_work, rsp_wakeup);
|
||||
rnp = rsp->level[rcu_num_lvls - 1];
|
||||
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
|
||||
while (i > rnp->grphi)
|
||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/threads.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/seqlock.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/irq_work.h>
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Define shape of hierarchy based on NR_CPUS, CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT, and
|
||||
@ -442,6 +443,7 @@ struct rcu_state {
|
||||
char *name; /* Name of structure. */
|
||||
char abbr; /* Abbreviated name. */
|
||||
struct list_head flavors; /* List of RCU flavors. */
|
||||
struct irq_work wakeup_work; /* Postponed wakeups */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* Values for rcu_state structure's gp_flags field. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user