mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-17 06:17:35 +00:00
sctp: Fix mis-ordering of user space data when multihoming in use
Recently had a bug reported to me, in which the user was sending packets with a payload containing a sequence number. The packets were getting delivered in order according the chunk TSN values, but the sequence values in the payload were arriving out of order. At first I thought it must be an application error, but we eventually found it to be a problem on the transmit side in the sctp stack. The conditions for the error are that multihoming must be in use, and it helps if each transport has a different pmtu. The problem occurs in sctp_outq_flush. Basically we dequeue packets from the data queue, and attempt to append them to the orrered packet for a given transport. After we append a data chunk we add the trasport to the end of a list of transports to have their packets sent at the end of sctp_outq_flush. The problem occurs when a data chunks fills up a offered packet on a transport. The function that does the appending (sctp_packet_transmit_chunk), will try to call sctp_packet_transmit on the full packet, and then append the chunk to a new packet. This call to sctp_packet_transmit, sends that packet ahead of the others that may be queued in the transport_list in sctp_outq_flush. The result is that frames that were sent in one order from the user space sending application get re-ordered prior to tsn assignment in sctp_packet_transmit, resulting in mis-sequencing of data payloads, even though tsn ordering is correct. The fix is to change where we assign a tsn. By doing this earlier, we are then free to place chunks in packets, whatever way we see fit and the protocol will make sure to do all the appropriate re-ordering on receive as is needed. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Reported-by: William Reich <reich@ulticom.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
46d5a80855
commit
d8dd15781d
@ -429,23 +429,22 @@ int sctp_packet_transmit(struct sctp_packet *packet)
|
||||
list_del_init(&chunk->list);
|
||||
if (sctp_chunk_is_data(chunk)) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (!chunk->has_tsn) {
|
||||
sctp_chunk_assign_ssn(chunk);
|
||||
sctp_chunk_assign_tsn(chunk);
|
||||
if (!chunk->resent) {
|
||||
|
||||
/* 6.3.1 C4) When data is in flight and when allowed
|
||||
* by rule C5, a new RTT measurement MUST be made each
|
||||
* round trip. Furthermore, new RTT measurements
|
||||
* SHOULD be made no more than once per round-trip
|
||||
* for a given destination transport address.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* 6.3.1 C4) When data is in flight and when allowed
|
||||
* by rule C5, a new RTT measurement MUST be made each
|
||||
* round trip. Furthermore, new RTT measurements
|
||||
* SHOULD be made no more than once per round-trip
|
||||
* for a given destination transport address.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (!tp->rto_pending) {
|
||||
chunk->rtt_in_progress = 1;
|
||||
tp->rto_pending = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
chunk->resent = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
chunk->resent = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
has_data = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -722,6 +721,8 @@ static void sctp_packet_append_data(struct sctp_packet *packet,
|
||||
/* Has been accepted for transmission. */
|
||||
if (!asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
|
||||
chunk->msg->can_abandon = 0;
|
||||
sctp_chunk_assign_tsn(chunk);
|
||||
sctp_chunk_assign_ssn(chunk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static sctp_xmit_t sctp_packet_will_fit(struct sctp_packet *packet,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user