From da92c47d069890106484cb6605df701a54d24499 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:43:26 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/memcg: replace inexistence move_lock_page_cgroup() by move_lock_mem_cgroup() in comment Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@gmail.com> Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> --- mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ac87e79b00d1..4f73c823c59f 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ again: return; /* * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't - * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold + * need to take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). Because we already hold * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true. */ @@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ void __mem_cgroup_end_update_page_stat(struct page *page, unsigned long *flags) /* * It's guaranteed that pc->mem_cgroup never changes while * lock is held because a routine modifies pc->mem_cgroup - * should take move_lock_page_cgroup(). + * should take move_lock_mem_cgroup(). */ move_unlock_mem_cgroup(pc->mem_cgroup, flags); }