mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-18 23:18:20 +00:00
perf_counter: call hw_perf_save_disable/restore around group_sched_in
I noticed that when enabling a group via the PERF_COUNTER_IOC_ENABLE ioctl on the group leader, the counters weren't enabled and counting immediately on return from the ioctl, but did start counting a little while later (presumably after a context switch). The reason was that __perf_counter_enable calls group_sched_in which calls hw_perf_group_sched_in, which on powerpc assumes that the caller has called hw_perf_save_disable already. Until commit 46d686c6 ("perf_counter: put whole group on when enabling group leader") it was true that all callers of group_sched_in had called hw_perf_save_disable first, and the powerpc hw_perf_group_sched_in relies on that (there isn't an x86 version). This fixes the problem by putting calls to hw_perf_save_disable / hw_perf_restore around the calls to group_sched_in and counter_sched_in in __perf_counter_enable. Having the calls to hw_perf_save_disable/restore around the counter_sched_in call is harmless and makes this call consistent with the other call sites of counter_sched_in, which have all called hw_perf_save_disable first. [ Impact: more precise counter group disable/enable functionality ] Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com> LKML-Reference: <18953.25733.53359.147452@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
615a3f1e05
commit
e758a33d6f
@ -663,6 +663,7 @@ static void __perf_counter_enable(void *info)
|
||||
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = &__get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
|
||||
struct perf_counter_context *ctx = counter->ctx;
|
||||
struct perf_counter *leader = counter->group_leader;
|
||||
unsigned long pmuflags;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -689,14 +690,18 @@ static void __perf_counter_enable(void *info)
|
||||
if (leader != counter && leader->state != PERF_COUNTER_STATE_ACTIVE)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!group_can_go_on(counter, cpuctx, 1))
|
||||
if (!group_can_go_on(counter, cpuctx, 1)) {
|
||||
err = -EEXIST;
|
||||
else if (counter == leader)
|
||||
err = group_sched_in(counter, cpuctx, ctx,
|
||||
smp_processor_id());
|
||||
else
|
||||
err = counter_sched_in(counter, cpuctx, ctx,
|
||||
smp_processor_id());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
pmuflags = hw_perf_save_disable();
|
||||
if (counter == leader)
|
||||
err = group_sched_in(counter, cpuctx, ctx,
|
||||
smp_processor_id());
|
||||
else
|
||||
err = counter_sched_in(counter, cpuctx, ctx,
|
||||
smp_processor_id());
|
||||
hw_perf_restore(pmuflags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user