mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-18 23:18:20 +00:00
mac80211: allow cancelling dependent ROCs
In my redesign of remain-on-channel I forgot that an item could be cancelled when it's a dependent item that is part of another item. Allow cancelling such items by removing them from the dependents list. Note that when we cancel the main item, all its dependents are also cancelled. It would be possible to not do that, but would need tricks to promote an item from dependent to top-level and is tricky in the HW ROC case. Reported-by: Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
535588e61a
commit
e979e33c39
@ -2305,6 +2305,21 @@ static int ieee80211_cancel_roc(struct ieee80211_local *local,
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&local->mtx);
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(roc, tmp, &local->roc_list, list) {
|
||||
struct ieee80211_roc_work *dep, *tmp2;
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(dep, tmp2, &roc->dependents, list) {
|
||||
if (!mgmt_tx && (unsigned long)dep != cookie)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
else if (mgmt_tx && dep->mgmt_tx_cookie != cookie)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
/* found dependent item -- just remove it */
|
||||
list_del(&dep->list);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&local->mtx);
|
||||
|
||||
ieee80211_roc_notify_destroy(dep);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!mgmt_tx && (unsigned long)roc != cookie)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
else if (mgmt_tx && roc->mgmt_tx_cookie != cookie)
|
||||
@ -2319,6 +2334,13 @@ static int ieee80211_cancel_roc(struct ieee80211_local *local,
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We found the item to cancel, so do that. Note that it
|
||||
* may have dependents, which we also cancel (and send
|
||||
* the expired signal for.) Not doing so would be quite
|
||||
* tricky here, but we may need to fix it later.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (local->ops->remain_on_channel) {
|
||||
if (found->started) {
|
||||
ret = drv_cancel_remain_on_channel(local);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user