From fb11c9c63f995afbe0e909f061d9866a722cb4bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:26:48 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: reduce code duplication inside cpuidle_idle_call() We are doing this twice in cpuidle_idle_call() routine: drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP Would be better if we actually store this in a local variable and use that. That reduces code duplication and likely makes this piece of code run faster (in case the compiler wasn't able to optimize it earlier) [rjw: Cast the result of bitwise AND to bool explicitly using !!] Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> --- drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c index 518b542cad54..86e805986d6f 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void) struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices); struct cpuidle_driver *drv; int next_state, entered_state; + bool broadcast; if (off || !initialized) return -ENODEV; @@ -141,7 +142,9 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void) trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu); - if (drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP) + broadcast = !!(drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP); + + if (broadcast) clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &dev->cpu); @@ -151,7 +154,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void) else entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state(dev, drv, next_state); - if (drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP) + if (broadcast) clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &dev->cpu);