From fb11c9c63f995afbe0e909f061d9866a722cb4bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 21:26:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: reduce code duplication inside cpuidle_idle_call()

We are doing this twice in cpuidle_idle_call() routine:
	drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP

Would be better if we actually store this in a local variable and
use that. That reduces code duplication and likely makes this piece
of code run faster (in case the compiler wasn't able to optimize it
earlier)

[rjw: Cast the result of bitwise AND to bool explicitly using !!]
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
index 518b542cad54..86e805986d6f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
@@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
 	struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices);
 	struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
 	int next_state, entered_state;
+	bool broadcast;
 
 	if (off || !initialized)
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -141,7 +142,9 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
 
 	trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(next_state, dev->cpu);
 
-	if (drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP)
+	broadcast = !!(drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP);
+
+	if (broadcast)
 		clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER,
 				   &dev->cpu);
 
@@ -151,7 +154,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
 	else
 		entered_state = cpuidle_enter_state(dev, drv, next_state);
 
-	if (drv->states[next_state].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP)
+	if (broadcast)
 		clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT,
 				   &dev->cpu);