FEX-Emu/linux
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git synced 2024-12-13 03:39:36 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

raid5: block failing device if raid will be failed

Browse Source 
Currently there is an inconsistency for failing the member drives
for arrays with different RAID levels. For RAID456 - there is a possibility
to fail all of the devices. However - for other RAID levels - kernel blocks
removing the member drive, if the operation results in array's FAIL state
(EBUSY is returned). For example - removing last drive from RAID1 is not
possible.
This kind of blocker was never implemented for raid456 and we cannot see
the reason why.

We had tested following patch and did not observe any regression, so do you
have any comments/reasons for current approach, or we can send the proper
patch for this?

Signed-off-by: Mariusz Tkaczyk <mariusz.tkaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mariusz Tkaczyk 2018-09-04 15:08:30 +02:00 committed by Shaohua Li
parent f151f57bfd
commit fb73b357fb
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
drivers/md/raid5.c
View File

@ -2681,6 +2681,18 @@ static void raid5_error(struct mddev *mddev, struct md_rdev *rdev)
pr_debug("raid456: error called\n");
spin_lock_irqsave(&conf->device_lock, flags);
if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
mddev->degraded == conf->max_degraded) {
/*
* Don't allow to achieve failed state
* Don't try to recover this device
*/
conf->recovery_disabled = mddev->recovery_disabled;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&conf->device_lock, flags);
return;
}
set_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
clear_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags);
mddev->degraded = raid5_calc_degraded(conf);