In __test_eb_bitmaps(), we write random data to a bitmap. Then copy
the bitmap to another bitmap that resides inside an extent buffer.
Later we verify the values of corresponding bits in the bitmap and the
bitmap inside the extent buffer. However, extent_buffer_test_bit()
reads in byte granularity while test_bit() reads in unsigned long
granularity. Hence we end up comparing wrong bits on big-endian
systems such as ppc64. This commit fixes the issue by reading the
bitmap in byte granularity.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
On ppc64, PAGE_SIZE is 64k which is same as BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE.
In such a scenario, we will never be able to have an extent buffer
containing more than one page. Hence in such cases this commit does not
execute the page straddling tests.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
self-tests code assumes 4k as the sectorsize and nodesize. This commit
fix hardcoded 4K. Enables the self-tests code to be executed on non-4k
page sized systems (e.g. ppc64).
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Xu <xufeifei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Callers pass GFP_NOFS and tests pass GFP_KERNEL, but using NOFS there
does not hurt. No need to pass the flags around.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
outdated comments.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE. And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.
Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.
Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special. They are
not.
The changes are pretty straight-forward:
- <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
- PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
- page_cache_get() -> get_page();
- page_cache_release() -> put_page();
This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below. For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.
The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach. I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch. Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.
virtual patch
@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE
@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK
@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)
@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There's no reason to do GFP_NOFS in tests, it's not data-heavy and
memory allocation failures would affect only developers or testers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We use many constants to represent size and offset value. And to make
code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to
represent '256MB'. However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB'
which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'.
So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with
single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is
not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's
more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'.
Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sanity test the extent buffer bitmap operations (test, set, and clear)
against the equivalent standard kernel operations.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Currently there's a 4B hole in the structure between refs and state and there
are only 16 bits used so we can make it unsigned. This will get a better
packing and may save some stack space for local variables.
The size of extent_state gets reduced by 8B and there are usually a lot
of slab objects.
struct extent_state {
u64 start; /* 0 8 */
u64 end; /* 8 8 */
struct rb_node rb_node; /* 16 24 */
wait_queue_head_t wq; /* 40 24 */
/* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
atomic_t refs; /* 64 4 */
/* XXX 4 bytes hole, try to pack */
long unsigned int state; /* 72 8 */
u64 private; /* 80 8 */
/* size: 88, cachelines: 2, members: 7 */
/* sum members: 84, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
};
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
So both Liu and I made huge messes of find_lock_delalloc_range trying to fix
stuff, me first by fixing extent size, then him by fixing something I broke and
then me again telling him to fix it a different way. So this is obviously a
candidate for some testing. This patch adds a pseudo fs so we can allocate fake
inodes for tests that need an inode or pages. Then it addes a bunch of tests to
make sure find_lock_delalloc_range is acting the way it is supposed to. With
this patch and all of our previous patches to find_lock_delalloc_range I am sure
it is working as expected now. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
