2445 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Viresh Kumar
09e390f30f cpufreq: s3c24xx: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from s3c24xx driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
5ab508bebf cpufreq: qoirq: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from qoirq driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
8ed5a219d0 cpufreq: pxa: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from pxa driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
20dfdb9c80 cpufreq: ppc_cbe: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from ppc_cbe driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
e2376d1fa0 cpufreq: powernow: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from powernow driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b01b531f67 cpufreq: p4-clockmod: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from p4-clockmod driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b563afbaa8 cpufreq: mediatek: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from mediatek driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
2c65616b98 cpufreq: longhaul: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from longhaul driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b6663622a3 cpufreq: ia64-acpi: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from ia64-acpi driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
c3e3cc8aa3 cpufreq: elanfreq: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from elanfreq driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
0d10539445 cpufreq: e_powersaver: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from e_powersaver driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
29aa18a762 cpufreq: cpufreq-dt: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from cpufreq-dt driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
5d8d4f9215 cpufreq: brcmstb: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from brcmstb driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:52 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
3c1f5a462e cpufreq: arm_big_little: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from arm_big_little driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
1a186d9e11 cpufreq: ACPI: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table in the acpi-cpufreq driver.

The driver needs to crosscheck if the max frequency corresponds to the
P-state 0 or not and the same is done from the ->ready() callback now.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
92c99d159c cpufreq: Don't validate cpufreq table from cpufreq_generic_init()
The cpufreq table is already validated by the cpufreq core and none of
the users of cpufreq_generic_init() have any dependency on it to
validate the table as well.

Don't validate the cpufreq table anymore from cpufreq_generic_init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
8d768cdcf0 cpufreq: imx6q: Find max freq from frequency table itself
This is a preparatory commit to make policy->suspend_freq independent of
validation of the cpufreq table, as a later commit would update
cpufreq_generic_init() to not validate the cpufreq table any longer.

The driver already assumes the order in which the frequency table is
sorted and we can get the max frequency easily.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 12:07:51 +01:00
Arnd Bergmann
3478b24c5e cpufreq: scpi: Add thermal dependency
A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular
thermal framework:

drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready':
scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit':
scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'

This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration
is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work.
Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the
THERMAL dependency.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 11:02:42 +01:00
Chunyu Hu
55b55abc17 cpufreq: cppc_cpufreq: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init() failure path
Kmemleak reported the below leak. When cppc_cpufreq_init went into
failure path, the cpu mask is not freed. After fix, this report is
gone. And to avaoid potential NULL pointer reference, check the cpu
value first.

unreferenced object 0xffff800fd5ea4880 (size 128):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294939510 (age 668.680s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  .... ...........
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<ffff0000082c4ae4>] __kmalloc_node+0x278/0x634
    [<ffff0000088f4a74>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x28/0x60
    [<ffff0000088f4af0>] zalloc_cpumask_var+0x14/0x1c
    [<ffff000008d20254>] cppc_cpufreq_init+0xd0/0x19c
    [<ffff000008083828>] do_one_initcall+0xec/0x15c
    [<ffff000008cd1018>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x2a4
    [<ffff0000089099b0>] kernel_init+0x18/0x10c
    [<ffff000008084d50>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
    [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20 10:52:31 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
bf14721c97 cpufreq: powernv: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from powernv driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-19 00:04:56 +01:00
Arnd Bergmann
697a3a873c cpufreq: scmi: add thermal dependency
A built-in scmi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular
thermal framework:

drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.o: In function `scmi_cpufreq_ready':
scmi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.o: In function `scmi_cpufreq_exit':
scmi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'

This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration
is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work.
Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the
THERMAL dependency.

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2018-03-13 15:26:01 +01:00
Arnd Bergmann
f46f11dc1e ARM SCMI support for v4.17
ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI)[1] is more flexible and
 easily extensible than any of the existing interfaces.
 
 Few existing as well as future ARM platforms provide micro-controllers
 to abstract various power and other system management tasks which have
 similar interfaces, both in terms of the functions that are provided by
 them, and in terms of how requests are communicated to them.
 
 There are quite a few protocols like ARM SCPI, TI SCI, QCOM RPM, Nvidia Tegra
 BPMP, and so on already. This specification is to standardize and avoid any
 further fragmentation in the design of such interface by various vendors.
 
 The current SCMI driver implementation is very basic and initial support.
 It lacks support for notifications, asynchronous/delayed response, perf/power
 statistics region and sensor register region.
 
 Mailbox is the only form of transport supported currently in the driver.
 SCMI supports interrupt based mailbox communication, where, on completion
 of the processing of a message, the caller receives an interrupt as well as
 polling for completion.
 
 SCMI is designed to minimize the dependency on the mailbox/transport
 hardware. So in terms of SCMI, each channel in the mailbox includes
 memory area, doorbell and completion interrupt.
 
 However the doorbell and completion interrupt is highly mailbox dependent
 which was bit of controversial as part of SCMI/mailbox discussions.
 
 Arnd and me discussed about the few aspects of SCMI and the mailbox framework:
 
 1. Use of mailbox framework for doorbell type mailbox controller:
    - Such hardware may not require any data to be sent to signal the remote
      about the presence of a message. The channel will have in-built
      information on how to trigger the signal to the remote.
      There are few mailbox controller drivers which are purely doorbell based.
      e.g.QCOM IPC, STM, Tegra, ACPI PCC,..etc
 
 2. Supporting other mailbox controller:
    - SCMI just needs a mechanism to signal the remote firmware. Such
      controller may need fixed message to be sent to trigger a doorbell.
      In such case we may need to get that data from DT and pass the same
      to the controller. It's not covered in the current DT binding, but
      can be extended as optional property in future.
 
      However handling notifications may be interesting on such mailbox, but
      again there is no way to interpret what the data field(remote message)
      means, it could be a bit mask or a number or don't-care.
 
 Arnd mentioned that he doesn't like the way the mailbox binding deals
 with doorbell-type hardware, but we do have quite a few precedent drivers
 already and changing the binding to add a data field would not make it any
 better, but could cause other problems. So he is happy with the status quo
 of SCMI implementation.
 
 [1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0056a/index.html
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1
 
 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJalvXJAAoJEABBurwxfuKYUHoQANi5gm0vGgRhb8/Cc6BHF9ij
 WVge3E2O+Ygg2qTKJJxWvwG3w09Pu9Pugwoa7vuisDNz4ihF+3WEYCZiwrbQhMOQ
 8ZyxXwdBu4Kp0fnNAGGq0MWllwspVgdC2Be5jviDTMw7H8ZIQEiKjxPkdSFY1xFj
 YAtTzuUeDcuztUb3IliOpLscxNUqGEQr4p/xj0VFu+1XSwtYo/9bDU7haiYNj0MD
 zbNv9WhyjUHTTsdQjDW4YGywQpFPu/oI8oSR5q+Q3mudccaZYbvvTwKDRACLVkr4
 rpeymFdGSEU8OI23pKql4eEZ2DC1VKuVnG9peTr9UhhuRL8jQKqFLeCYH0fGcY89
 VGWDIFBjyUg1NK7giCriqCq4m68UM49ChITXY6zRrIvyONgUZj6p6kTmCHC3TULH
 LWfu9lf7XqI5/AqZaXhHsDPL2Arf0u5K7rP6yaU0BgdQ2HRKV8rIT3KadjsOioAw
 bIDfpi4eInmq41CUy1gsWP6nIRg4qR4sZiWC2CW8ap0gbHq8a7PVuuRi4VDCZIkN
 CfntuDAnE+FMq/cMpgLRGteNbl0MVAeAeJfEGNyk5ahhYZtvnAy142zDpBmvWZth
 ZuZvb7mwiNPiZTC65B/DFDdSCKZtD+LVCodzcm2Pkx6zgW0SC6pje+mX0+zpDxZ9
 A9Eguiun1hInKX3URD1D
 =qOck
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'scmi-updates-4.17' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux into next/drivers

Pull "ARM SCMI support for v4.17" from Sudeep Holla:

ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI)[1] is more flexible and
easily extensible than any of the existing interfaces.

Few existing as well as future ARM platforms provide micro-controllers
to abstract various power and other system management tasks which have
similar interfaces, both in terms of the functions that are provided by
them, and in terms of how requests are communicated to them.

There are quite a few protocols like ARM SCPI, TI SCI, QCOM RPM, Nvidia Tegra
BPMP, and so on already. This specification is to standardize and avoid any
further fragmentation in the design of such interface by various vendors.

The current SCMI driver implementation is very basic and initial support.
It lacks support for notifications, asynchronous/delayed response, perf/power
statistics region and sensor register region.

Mailbox is the only form of transport supported currently in the driver.
SCMI supports interrupt based mailbox communication, where, on completion
of the processing of a message, the caller receives an interrupt as well as
polling for completion.

SCMI is designed to minimize the dependency on the mailbox/transport
hardware. So in terms of SCMI, each channel in the mailbox includes
memory area, doorbell and completion interrupt.

However the doorbell and completion interrupt is highly mailbox dependent
which was bit of controversial as part of SCMI/mailbox discussions.

Arnd and me discussed about the few aspects of SCMI and the mailbox framework:

1. Use of mailbox framework for doorbell type mailbox controller:
   - Such hardware may not require any data to be sent to signal the remote
     about the presence of a message. The channel will have in-built
     information on how to trigger the signal to the remote.
     There are few mailbox controller drivers which are purely doorbell based.
     e.g.QCOM IPC, STM, Tegra, ACPI PCC,..etc

2. Supporting other mailbox controller:
   - SCMI just needs a mechanism to signal the remote firmware. Such
     controller may need fixed message to be sent to trigger a doorbell.
     In such case we may need to get that data from DT and pass the same
     to the controller. It's not covered in the current DT binding, but
     can be extended as optional property in future.

     However handling notifications may be interesting on such mailbox, but
     again there is no way to interpret what the data field(remote message)
     means, it could be a bit mask or a number or don't-care.

Arnd mentioned that he doesn't like the way the mailbox binding deals
with doorbell-type hardware, but we do have quite a few precedent drivers
already and changing the binding to add a data field would not make it any
better, but could cause other problems. So he is happy with the status quo
of SCMI implementation.

[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0056a/index.html

* tag 'scmi-updates-4.17' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux:
  cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching
  cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol
  hwmon: add support for sensors exported via ARM SCMI
  hwmon: (core) Add hwmon_max to hwmon_sensor_types enumeration
  clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI
  firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpd
  firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objects
  firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels
  firmware: arm_scmi: add option for polling based performance domain operations
  firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers
  firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocols
  firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol
  firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol
  firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol
  firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol
  firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices
  firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol
  firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI
  dt-bindings: arm: add support for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol
  dt-bindings: mailbox: add support for mailbox client shared memory
2018-03-07 16:45:07 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
1179c2aeb4 Merge cpufreq fixes from v4.16-rc4. 2018-03-05 12:37:06 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
b61e070305 Merge branch 'cpufreq-scpi'
* cpufreq-scpi:
  cpufreq: scpi: Fix incorrect arm_big_little config dependency
  cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
2018-03-02 10:44:44 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
02f208c5c6 cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching
The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch
callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context.

This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver
by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag
fast_switch_possible.

Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-02-28 16:37:57 +00:00
Sudeep Holla
99d6bdf338 cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol
On some ARM based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control
Processor(SCP) provides the overall power, clock, reset and system
control including CPU DVFS. SCMI Message Protocol is used to
communicate with the SCP.

This patch adds a cpufreq driver for such systems using SCMI interface
to drive CPU DVFS.

Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-02-28 16:37:57 +00:00
Markus Elfring
0f555518ea cpufreq: powernow-k8: Drop unnecessary return statements from two functions
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.

WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful

Thus remove such a statement in the affected functions.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Markus Elfring
7f3a1d66df cpufreq: powernow-k8: Drop memory allocation error messages from three functions
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Markus Elfring
d6b96e4706 cpufreq: qoriq: Drop memory allocation error messages from qoriq_cpufreq_cpu_init()
Omit extra messages for a memory allocation failure in this function.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Markus Elfring
d430fb9984 cpufreq: s3c24xx: Drop memory allocation error messages from two functions
Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in these functions.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:29:01 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
3e3b507ef6 cpufreq: tegra186: Break after initialization is done for policy->cpu
There are two clusters (2 + 4 CPUs) on this platform and a separate
cpufreq policy is available for each of the CPUs. The loop in
tegra186_cpufreq_init() tries to find the structure for the right CPU
and finish initialization. But it is missing a `break` statement at the
end, which forces it to restart the loop even when the CPU already
matched and initialization is done.

Fix that by adding the missing `break` statement.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
d417e0691a cpufreq: Validate frequency table in the core
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init()
callbacks to validate the frequency table.

However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it
lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a
later point in time.  It would be better if the core could
validate the frequency table during driver initialization.

To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make
the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback
of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid.

For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once
from the driver and then from the core.  The individual drivers will
be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it
for other reasons.

The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper
now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only
be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going
forward).

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
b24b6478e6 cpufreq: Reorder cpufreq_online() error code path
Ideally the de-allocation of resources should happen in the exact
opposite order in which they were allocated. It helps maintain the code
in long term, even if nothing really breaks with incorrect ordering.

That wasn't followed in cpufreq_online() and it has some
inconsistencies.  For example, the symlinks were created from within
the locked region while they are removed only after putting the locks.
Also ->exit() should have been called only after the symlinks are
removed and the lock is dropped, as that was the case when ->init()
was first called.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
cb8bd2ff15 cpufreq: mediatek: Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug()
With multi-platform build images, this shows a message on non mediatek
platforms, which is unnecessary. Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug() here.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 18:22:12 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
0373ca7483 cpufreq: s3c24xx: Fix broken s3c_cpufreq_init()
commit a307a1e6bc0d "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()"
accidentally broke cpufreq on s3c2410 and s3c2412.

These two platforms don't have a CPU frequency table and used to skip
calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() for them.  But with the
above commit, we started calling it unconditionally and that will
eventually fail as the frequency table pointer is NULL.

Fix this by calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() conditionally
again.

Fixes: a307a1e6bc0d "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()"
Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-27 17:23:51 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
5c8b2623f6 cpufreq: scpi: Fix incorrect arm_big_little config dependency
Commit 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
removed the SCPI cpufreq dependency on arm_big_little cpufreq driver.
However the Kconfig entry still depends on ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ
which is clearly wrong.

This patch removes that unnecessary Kconfig dependency.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-26 23:29:19 +01:00
Dietmar Eggemann
9326fdf3fb cpufreq: scpi: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
Commit 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
changed the cpufreq driver on juno from arm_big_little to scpi.

The scpi set_target function does not call the frequency-invariance
setter function arch_set_freq_scale() like the arm_big_little set_target
function does. As a result the task scheduler load and utilization
signals are not frequency-invariant on this platform anymore.

Fix this by adding a call to arch_set_freq_scale() into
scpi_cpufreq_set_target().

Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-26 23:27:56 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
d4667ca142 Merge branch 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates from Ingo Molnar:
 "Here's the latest set of Spectre and PTI related fixes and updates:

  Spectre:
   - Add entry code register clearing to reduce the Spectre attack
     surface
   - Update the Spectre microcode blacklist
   - Inline the KVM Spectre helpers to get close to v4.14 performance
     again.
   - Fix indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
   - Fix/improve Spectre related kernel messages
   - Fix array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint
   - KVM: fix two MSR handling bugs

  PTI:
   - Fix a paranoid entry PTI CR3 handling bug
   - Fix comments

  objtool:
   - Fix paranoid_entry() frame pointer warning
   - Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable
   - Various fixes
   - Add Add Peter Zijlstra as objtool co-maintainer

  Misc:
   - Various x86 entry code self-test fixes
   - Improve/simplify entry code stack frame generation and handling
     after recent heavy-handed PTI and Spectre changes. (There's two
     more WIP improvements expected here.)
   - Type fix for cache entries

  There's also some low risk non-fix changes I've included in this
  branch to reduce backporting conflicts:

   - rename a confusing x86_cpu field name
   - de-obfuscate the naming of single-TLB flushing primitives"

* 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits)
  x86/entry/64: Fix CR3 restore in paranoid_exit()
  x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int
  x86/spectre: Fix an error message
  x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping
  selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault
  x86/mm: Rename flush_tlb_single() and flush_tlb_one() to __flush_tlb_one_[user|kernel]()
  x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency
  nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro
  x86/speculation: Fix up array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint
  x86/debug: Use UD2 for WARN()
  x86/debug, objtool: Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable
  objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn()
  selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems
  selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c
  selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in test_mremap_vdso.c
  selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory
  selftests/x86/pkeys: Remove unused functions
  selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage
  selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none
  x86/entry/64: Remove the unused 'icebp' macro
  ...
2018-02-14 17:02:15 -08:00
Jia Zhang
b399151cb4 x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping
x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the
processor's stepping.

Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c.

Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang <qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
[ Updated it to more recent kernels. ]
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: tony.luck@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514771530-70829-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-15 01:15:52 +01:00
Nicolas Chauvet
d0404738c6 arm: imx: Add MODULE_ALIAS for cpufreq
Without this, the imx6q-cpufreq driver isn't loaded
automatically when built as a module

Tested on wandboard quad with a fedora 27 kernel rpm

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:39 +01:00
Dominik Brodowski
ffd81dcfef cpufreq: Add and use cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry_idx()
Pointer subtraction is slow and tedious. Therefore, replace all instances
where cpufreq_for_each_{valid_,}entry loops contained such substractions
with an iteration macro providing an index to the frequency_table entry.

Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180120020237.GM13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:39 +01:00
Chen Yu
70f6bf2a3b cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable HWP during system resume on CPU0
When maxcpus=1 is in the kernel command line, the BP is responsible
for re-enabling the HWP - because currently only the APs invoke
intel_pstate_hwp_enable() during their online process - which might
put the system into unstable state after resume.

Fix this by enabling the HWP explicitly on BP during resume.

Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yu Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog, minor modifications ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:38 +01:00
Wei Yongjun
0725390da9 cpufreq: scpi: fix error return code in scpi_cpufreq_init()
Fix to return a negative error code from the clk_get() error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-08 10:21:15 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
eb85c50c24 cpufreq: scpi: fix static checker warning cdev isn't an ERR_PTR
Commit 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
leads to the following static checker warning:

	drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c:203 scpi_cpufreq_ready()
	warn: 'cdev' isn't an ERR_PTR

of_cpufreq_cooling_register() returns NULL on error. This patch removes
the incorrect IS_ERR check on the returned pointer.

Fixes: 343a8d17fa8d (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:51:41 +01:00
Corentin LABBE
3d70671667 cpufreq: remove at32ap-cpufreq
Since AVR32 arch was removed, at32ap-cpufreq is useless.
Remove this driver.

Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:44:23 +01:00
Akshu Agrawal
59a3b3a8db cpufreq: AMD: Ignore the check for ProcFeedback in ST/CZ
In ST/CZ CPUID 8000_0007_EDX[11, ProcFeedbackInterface] is 0,
but the mechanism is still available and can be used.

Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@amd.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-07 11:26:37 +01:00
Bo Yan
703cbaa601 cpufreq: Skip cpufreq resume if it's not suspended
cpufreq_resume can be called even without preceding cpufreq_suspend.
This can happen in following scenario:

    suspend_devices_and_enter
       --> dpm_suspend_start
          --> dpm_prepare
              --> device_prepare : this function errors out
          --> dpm_suspend: this is skipped due to dpm_prepare failure
                           this means cpufreq_suspend is skipped over
       --> goto Recover_platform, due to previous error
       --> goto Resume_devices
       --> dpm_resume_end
           --> dpm_resume
               --> cpufreq_resume

In case schedutil is used as frequency governor, cpufreq_resume will
eventually call sugov_start, which does following:

    memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
    ....

This effectively erases function pointer for frequency update, causing
crash later on. The function pointer would have been set correctly if
subsequent cpufreq_add_update_util_hook runs successfully, but that
function returns earlier because cpufreq_suspend was not called:

    if (WARN_ON(per_cpu(cpufreq_update_util_data, cpu)))
		return;

The fix is to check cpufreq_suspended first, if it's false, that means
cpufreq_suspend was not called in the first place, so do not resume
cpufreq.

Signed-off-by: Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Dropped printing a message ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-02-05 11:03:33 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
f06970f4b0 Merge branch 'pm-cpufreq-thermal' into pm-cpufreq
* pm-cpufreq-thermal:
  cpu_cooling: Remove static-power related documentation
  cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff
  cpu_cooling: Keep only one of_cpufreq*cooling_register() helper
  cpu_cooling: Remove unused cpufreq_power_cooling_register()
  cpu_cooling: Make of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register() parse DT
2018-01-18 02:52:42 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
343a8d17fa cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency
The dependency on physical_package_id from the topology to get the
cluster identifier is wrong. The concept of cluster used in ARM topology
is unfortunately not well defined in the architecture, we should avoid
using it. Further the frequency domain need not be mapped to so called
"clusters" one to one.

SCPI already provides means to obtain the frequency domain id from the
device tree. In order to support some new topologies(e.g. DSU which
contains 2 frequency domains within the physical cluster), pseudo
clusters are created to make this driver work which is wrong again.

In order to solve those issues and also remove dependency of topological
physical id for frequency domain, this patch removes the arm_big_little
dependency from scpi driver.

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-01-17 12:59:33 +01:00
Shilpasri G Bhat
3fa4680b86 cpufreq: powernv: Dont assume distinct pstate values for nominal and pmin
Some OpenPOWER boxes can have same pstate values for nominal and
pmin pstates. In these boxes the current code will not initialize
'powernv_pstate_info.min' variable and result in erroneous CPU
frequency reporting. This patch fixes this problem.

Fixes: 09ca4c9b5958 (cpufreq: powernv: Replacing pstate_id with frequency table index)
Reported-by: Alvin Wang <wangat@tw.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-01-12 13:44:08 +01:00