This kind of memcpy() is error-prone. Its replacement with a struct
assignment is prefered because it's type-safe and much easier to read.
Found by coccinelle. Hand patched and reviewed.
Tested by compilation only.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
identifier struct_name;
struct struct_name to;
struct struct_name from;
expression E;
@@
-memcpy(&(to), &(from), E);
+to = from;
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c: In function ‘check_firmware’:
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:1048:45: warning: ‘fw_minor’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:1048:39: warning: ‘fw_major’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:1062:39: warning: ‘hw_minor’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
drivers/media/tuners/xc4000.c:1062:33: warning: ‘hw_major’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Move the tuners one level up, as the "common" directory will be used
by drivers that are shared between more than one driver.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
