mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-23 18:07:03 +00:00
201b3fe586
The validity of the property input argument to of_remove_property() is never checked within the function and thus it is possible to pass a null value. It happens that this will be picked up in __of_remove_property() as no matching property of the device node will be found and thus an error will be returned, however once again there is no explicit check for a null value. By the time this is detected 2 locks have already been acquired which is completely unnecessary if the property to remove is null. Add an explicit check in the function of_remove_property() for a null property value and return -ENODEV in this case, this is consistent with what the previous return value would have been when the null value was not detected and passed to __of_remove_property(). By moving an explicit check for the property paramenter into the of_remove_property() function, this will remove the need to perform this check in calling code before invocation of the of_remove_property() function. Signed-off-by: Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@gmail.com> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| unittest-data | ||
| address.c | ||
| base.c | ||
| device.c | ||
| dynamic.c | ||
| fdt_address.c | ||
| fdt.c | ||
| irq.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| of_mdio.c | ||
| of_mtd.c | ||
| of_net.c | ||
| of_pci_irq.c | ||
| of_pci.c | ||
| of_private.h | ||
| of_reserved_mem.c | ||
| overlay.c | ||
| pdt.c | ||
| platform.c | ||
| resolver.c | ||
| unittest.c | ||