Joonsoo Kim 23f0d2093c sched: Factor out code to should_we_balance()
Now checking whether this cpu is appropriate to balance or not
is embedded into update_sg_lb_stats() and this checking has no direct
relationship to this function. There is not enough reason to place
this checking at update_sg_lb_stats(), except saving one iteration
for sched_group_cpus.

In this patch, I factor out this checking to should_we_balance() function.
And before doing actual work for load_balancing, check whether this cpu is
appropriate to balance via should_we_balance(). If this cpu is not
a candidate for balancing, it quit the work immediately.

With this change, we can save two memset cost and can expect better
compiler optimization.

Below is result of this patch.

 * Vanilla *
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  34499	   1136	    116	  35751	   8ba7	kernel/sched/fair.o

 * Patched *
   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
  34243	   1136	    116	  35495	   8aa7	kernel/sched/fair.o

In addition, rename @balance to @continue_balancing in order to represent
its purpose more clearly.

Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
[ s/should_balance/continue_balancing/g ]
Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
[ Made style changes and a fix in should_we_balance(). ]
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1375778203-31343-3-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2013-09-02 08:27:34 +02:00
..
2013-07-18 12:48:40 -07:00
2013-04-22 07:09:06 -07:00
2013-04-15 13:25:16 +02:00
2013-06-25 23:11:19 +02:00
2012-12-20 17:40:19 -08:00
2013-07-02 15:38:19 +09:30
2013-07-03 16:08:05 -07:00
2013-05-05 00:16:35 -04:00
2013-04-29 13:55:38 -07:00