mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-15 13:22:55 +00:00
4008c04a07
Btrfs is currently using spin_lock_nested with a nested value based on the tree depth of the block. But, this doesn't quite work because the max tree depth is bigger than what spin_lock_nested can deal with, and because locks are sometimes taken before the level field is filled in. The solution here is to use lockdep_set_class_and_name instead, and to set the class before unlocking the pages when the block is read from the disk and just after init of a freshly allocated tree block. btrfs_clear_path_blocking is also changed to take the locks in the proper order, and it also makes sure all the locks currently held are properly set to blocking before it tries to retake the spinlocks. Otherwise, lockdep gets upset about bad lock orderin. The lockdep magic cam from Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
228 lines
6.0 KiB
C
228 lines
6.0 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2008 Oracle. All rights reserved.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
|
|
* License v2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
|
* General Public License for more details.
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
|
|
* License along with this program; if not, write to the
|
|
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
|
|
* Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA.
|
|
*/
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/gfp.h>
|
|
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
#include <linux/page-flags.h>
|
|
#include <asm/bug.h>
|
|
#include "ctree.h"
|
|
#include "extent_io.h"
|
|
#include "locking.h"
|
|
|
|
static inline void spin_nested(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
spin_lock(&eb->lock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Setting a lock to blocking will drop the spinlock and set the
|
|
* flag that forces other procs who want the lock to wait. After
|
|
* this you can safely schedule with the lock held.
|
|
*/
|
|
void btrfs_set_lock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags)) {
|
|
set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags);
|
|
spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
|
|
}
|
|
/* exit with the spin lock released and the bit set */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* clearing the blocking flag will take the spinlock again.
|
|
* After this you can't safely schedule
|
|
*/
|
|
void btrfs_clear_lock_blocking(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags)) {
|
|
spin_nested(eb);
|
|
clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags);
|
|
smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
|
|
}
|
|
/* exit with the spin lock held */
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* unfortunately, many of the places that currently set a lock to blocking
|
|
* don't end up blocking for every long, and often they don't block
|
|
* at all. For a dbench 50 run, if we don't spin one the blocking bit
|
|
* at all, the context switch rate can jump up to 400,000/sec or more.
|
|
*
|
|
* So, we're still stuck with this crummy spin on the blocking bit,
|
|
* at least until the most common causes of the short blocks
|
|
* can be dealt with.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int btrfs_spin_on_block(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 512; i++) {
|
|
cpu_relax();
|
|
if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
if (need_resched())
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is somewhat different from trylock. It will take the
|
|
* spinlock but if it finds the lock is set to blocking, it will
|
|
* return without the lock held.
|
|
*
|
|
* returns 1 if it was able to take the lock and zero otherwise
|
|
*
|
|
* After this call, scheduling is not safe without first calling
|
|
* btrfs_set_lock_blocking()
|
|
*/
|
|
int btrfs_try_spin_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
spin_nested(eb);
|
|
if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
|
|
|
|
/* spin for a bit on the BLOCKING flag */
|
|
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
|
|
if (!btrfs_spin_on_block(eb))
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
spin_nested(eb);
|
|
if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* the autoremove wake function will return 0 if it tried to wake up
|
|
* a process that was already awake, which means that process won't
|
|
* count as an exclusive wakeup. The waitq code will continue waking
|
|
* procs until it finds one that was actually sleeping.
|
|
*
|
|
* For btrfs, this isn't quite what we want. We want a single proc
|
|
* to be notified that the lock is ready for taking. If that proc
|
|
* already happen to be awake, great, it will loop around and try for
|
|
* the lock.
|
|
*
|
|
* So, btrfs_wake_function always returns 1, even when the proc that we
|
|
* tried to wake up was already awake.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int btrfs_wake_function(wait_queue_t *wait, unsigned mode,
|
|
int sync, void *key)
|
|
{
|
|
autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* returns with the extent buffer spinlocked.
|
|
*
|
|
* This will spin and/or wait as required to take the lock, and then
|
|
* return with the spinlock held.
|
|
*
|
|
* After this call, scheduling is not safe without first calling
|
|
* btrfs_set_lock_blocking()
|
|
*/
|
|
int btrfs_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
|
|
wait.func = btrfs_wake_function;
|
|
|
|
while(1) {
|
|
spin_nested(eb);
|
|
|
|
/* nobody is blocking, exit with the spinlock held */
|
|
if (!test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* we have the spinlock, but the real owner is blocking.
|
|
* wait for them
|
|
*/
|
|
spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* spin for a bit, and if the blocking flag goes away,
|
|
* loop around
|
|
*/
|
|
if (btrfs_spin_on_block(eb))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
prepare_to_wait_exclusive(&eb->lock_wq, &wait,
|
|
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
|
|
|
if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
|
|
schedule();
|
|
|
|
finish_wait(&eb->lock_wq, &wait);
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Very quick trylock, this does not spin or schedule. It returns
|
|
* 1 with the spinlock held if it was able to take the lock, or it
|
|
* returns zero if it was unable to take the lock.
|
|
*
|
|
* After this call, scheduling is not safe without first calling
|
|
* btrfs_set_lock_blocking()
|
|
*/
|
|
int btrfs_try_tree_lock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
if (spin_trylock(&eb->lock)) {
|
|
if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* we've got the spinlock, but the real owner is
|
|
* blocking. Drop the spinlock and return failure
|
|
*/
|
|
spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
/* someone else has the spinlock giveup */
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int btrfs_tree_unlock(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* if we were a blocking owner, we don't have the spinlock held
|
|
* just clear the bit and look for waiters
|
|
*/
|
|
if (test_and_clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags))
|
|
smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
|
|
else
|
|
spin_unlock(&eb->lock);
|
|
|
|
if (waitqueue_active(&eb->lock_wq))
|
|
wake_up(&eb->lock_wq);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int btrfs_tree_locked(struct extent_buffer *eb)
|
|
{
|
|
return test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_BLOCKING, &eb->bflags) ||
|
|
spin_is_locked(&eb->lock);
|
|
}
|