Arnd Bergmann c7cbdbf29f net: rework SIOCGSTAMP ioctl handling ... The SIOCGSTAMP/SIOCGSTAMPNS ioctl commands are implemented by many socket protocol handlers, and all of those end up calling the same sock_get_timestamp()/sock_get_timestampns() helper functions, which results in a lot of duplicate code. With the introduction of 64-bit time_t on 32-bit architectures, this gets worse, as we then need four different ioctl commands in each socket protocol implementation. To simplify that, let's add a new .gettstamp() operation in struct proto_ops, and move ioctl implementation into the common sock_ioctl()/compat_sock_ioctl_trans() functions that these all go through. We can reuse the sock_get_timestamp() implementation, but generalize it so it can deal with both native and compat mode, as well as timeval and timespec structures. Acked-by: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK8P3a038aDQQotzua_QtKGhq8O9n+rdiz2=WDCp82ys8eUT+A@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>		2019-04-19 14:07:40 -07:00
..
af_rose.c	net: rework SIOCGSTAMP ioctl handling	2019-04-19 14:07:40 -07:00
Makefile
rose_dev.c
rose_in.c
rose_link.c
rose_loopback.c
rose_out.c
rose_route.c	net/rose: fix NULL ax25_cb kernel panic	2019-01-27 10:40:01 -08:00
rose_subr.c	net: rose: fix a possible stack overflow	2019-03-18 16:53:22 -07:00
rose_timer.c
sysctl_net_rose.c