linux/fs/ncpfs
Al Viro ebfc3b49a7 don't pass nameidata to ->create()
boolean "does it have to be exclusive?" flag is passed instead;
Local filesystem should just ignore it - the object is guaranteed
not to be there yet.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2012-07-14 16:34:47 +04:00
..
dir.c don't pass nameidata to ->create() 2012-07-14 16:34:47 +04:00
file.c fs: introduce inode operation ->update_time 2012-06-01 12:07:25 -04:00
getopt.c
getopt.h
inode.c vfs: Rename end_writeback() to clear_inode() 2012-05-06 13:43:41 +08:00
ioctl.c vfs: mnt_drop_write_file() 2012-01-03 22:52:40 -05:00
Kconfig
Makefile fs: change to new flag variable 2011-03-17 14:02:57 +01:00
mmap.c Remove all #inclusions of asm/system.h 2012-03-28 18:30:03 +01:00
ncp_fs_i.h
ncp_fs_sb.h get rid of idiotic misplaced __kernel_mode_t in ncfps kernel-private data structure 2012-05-29 23:28:42 -04:00
ncp_fs.h
ncplib_kernel.c
ncplib_kernel.h ncpfs: propagate umode_t 2012-01-03 22:55:05 -05:00
ncpsign_kernel.c
ncpsign_kernel.h
sock.c
symlink.c ncpfs: propagate umode_t 2012-01-03 22:55:05 -05:00