David Sterba 7e75bf3ff3 btrfs: properly access unaligned checksum buffer
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:56:53AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> Thanks for fielding this one.  Does put_unaligned_le32 optimize away on
> platforms with efficient access?  It would be great if we didn't need
> the #ifdef.

(quicktest: assembly output is same for put_unaligned_le32 and direct
assignment on my x86_64)
I was originally following examples in
Documentation/unaligned-memory-access.txt. From other code it seems to me that
the define CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is intended for larger
portions of code. Macros/wrappers for {put,get}_unaligned* are chosen via
arch/<arch>/include/asm/unaligned.h accordingly, therefore it's safe to use
put_unaligned_le32 without the ifdef.

dave

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-03-28 05:37:36 -04:00
..
2011-01-12 20:03:43 -05:00
2011-01-12 20:02:45 -05:00
2011-01-12 20:03:42 -05:00
2011-02-25 11:12:37 -08:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-02-21 22:31:47 +00:00
2010-10-29 04:16:28 -04:00
2010-10-29 04:16:28 -04:00
2011-02-11 16:50:47 -06:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-03-03 01:28:17 -05:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-14 09:23:36 -08:00
2011-01-12 20:03:42 -05:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-12 20:02:43 -05:00
2011-03-03 01:28:16 -05:00
2011-03-08 19:46:10 -05:00
2010-10-29 04:16:13 -04:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2010-10-29 04:16:31 -04:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-03-03 01:28:16 -05:00
2011-01-07 17:50:26 +11:00
2011-03-03 01:28:40 -05:00
2011-03-03 01:28:16 -05:00
2011-01-13 08:03:12 -08:00
2010-10-29 04:16:28 -04:00
2011-02-02 16:03:19 -08:00
2011-02-02 16:03:19 -08:00
2011-01-07 17:50:27 +11:00
2010-10-28 09:44:56 -07:00
2011-01-13 17:32:32 -08:00
2011-02-24 02:10:57 -05:00
2011-01-07 17:50:33 +11:00