A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@decl@
identifier i1,fld;
type T;
field list[n] fs;
@@
struct i1 {
fs
T fld;
...};
@bad@
identifier decl.i1,i2;
expression e;
initializer list[decl.n] is;
@@
struct i1 i2 = { is,
+ .fld = e
- e
,...};
// </smpl>
Not sure why, but some tables are still using the old way,
but at least several of them got fixed.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
09628b2c21