mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/linux.git
synced 2024-12-25 19:07:46 +00:00
6ec3cfeca0
As discussed in the thread here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123964468521142&w=2
Eric W. Biederman observed:
> It looks like some additional bugs have slipped in since last I looked.
>
> set_irq_affinity does this:
> ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_PENDING_IRQ
> if (desc->status & IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT || desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED) {
> cpumask_copy(desc->affinity, cpumask);
> desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, cpumask);
> } else {
> desc->status |= IRQ_MOVE_PENDING;
> cpumask_copy(desc->pending_mask, cpumask);
> }
> #else
>
> That IRQ_DISABLED case is a software state and as such it has nothing to
> do with how safe it is to move an irq in process context.
[...]
>
> The only reason we migrate MSIs in interrupt context today is that there
> wasn't infrastructure for support migration both in interrupt context
> and outside of it.
Yes. The idea here was to force the MSI migration to happen in process
context. One of the patches in the series did
disable_irq(dev->irq);
irq_set_affinity(dev->irq, cpumask_of(dev->cpu));
enable_irq(dev->irq);
with the above patch adding irq/manage code check for interrupt disabled
and moving the interrupt in process context.
IIRC, there was no IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT when we were developing this HPET
code and we ended up having this ugly hack. IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT was there
when we eventually submitted the patch upstream. But, looks like I did a
blind rebasing instead of using IRQ_MOVE_PCNTXT in hpet MSI code.
Below patch fixes this. i.e., revert commit
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| autoprobe.c | ||
| chip.c | ||
| devres.c | ||
| handle.c | ||
| internals.h | ||
| Makefile | ||
| manage.c | ||
| migration.c | ||
| numa_migrate.c | ||
| pm.c | ||
| proc.c | ||
| resend.c | ||
| spurious.c | ||