Fix checkpatch warnings:
"WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf"
Andrew Morton wrote:
"
- puts is presumably faster
- puts doesn't go rogue if you accidentally pass it a "%".
- this patch actually made fs/ubifs/super.o 12 bytes smaller.
Perhaps because seq_printf() is a varargs function, forcing the
caller to pass args on the stack instead of in registers.
"
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
d4eb08ff0a