Artem Bityutskiy e8ea175913 UBIFS: do not use WB_SYNC_HOLD
WB_SYNC_HOLD is going to be zapped so we should not use it. Use
%WB_SYNC_NONE instead. Here is what akpm said:

"I think I'll just switch that to WB_SYNC_NONE.  The `wait==0' mode is
just an advisory thing to help the fs shove lots of data into the
queues.  If some gets missed then it'll be picked up on the second
->sync_fs call, with wait==1."

Thanks to Randy Dunlap for catching this.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-06 15:59:09 -08:00
..
2008-12-25 11:40:09 +11:00
2009-01-05 11:54:28 -05:00
2008-12-31 18:07:43 -05:00
2009-01-05 07:45:02 +00:00
2008-11-14 10:39:25 +11:00
2009-01-05 08:40:30 -08:00
2008-12-30 16:51:43 -05:00
2009-01-05 11:54:28 -05:00
2009-01-05 11:54:27 -05:00
2009-01-05 11:54:28 -05:00
2008-11-18 15:08:56 +01:00
2009-01-06 15:59:09 -08:00
2008-12-04 17:16:36 +11:00
2008-12-29 16:47:18 +11:00
2008-12-29 08:29:50 +01:00
2008-12-31 18:07:43 -05:00
2009-01-03 11:45:54 -08:00
2008-12-29 08:29:53 +01:00
2008-12-31 18:07:38 -05:00
2008-12-25 11:40:09 +11:00
2009-01-06 15:59:01 -08:00
2009-01-05 07:38:46 +00:00
2008-12-31 18:07:41 -05:00
2009-01-05 11:54:28 -05:00
2009-01-04 15:14:41 -05:00
2008-10-30 11:38:45 -07:00
2009-01-05 11:54:28 -05:00
2009-01-06 15:59:00 -08:00
2009-01-05 11:54:28 -05:00