* feat: advisory AI review of needs-human and scout PRs with OpenCode V2
A scheduled workflow runs `opencode run` (V2, pinned and checksummed)
with a read-only catalog-reviewer agent over evidence bundles for open
PRs labeled needs-human or scout and for unreviewed scout candidates.
PRs get one verdict comment and an ai-* label; confident scout accepts
get a bot PR. It never merges or closes.
The model runs in a job with no GitHub token; the agent may only read,
glob and grep inside the repository (a self-test proves it before each
run); verdicts are schema-validated and rendered by our own code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
* fix(ai-review): address CodeQL and SonarCloud security findings
Enforce HTTPS on the OpenCode download, run opencode by absolute path,
escape summary cells with escapeCell, rely on HTML escaping instead of
comment-stripping regexes, validate item IDs before routing API calls,
and bound verdict parsing on runaway output.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
---------
Co-authored-by: John Smith <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
docs/policy.md is the reference the bots link to (admission, V2 rule, V1 sunset, health and removal, discovery, automation map). contributing.md documents the issue form, scaffolder and fields. The review-loop prompts now defer schema/duplicate/V2 checks to CI, drop the 6-month activity rule, and require merging through PRs instead of pushing to main. Translated READMEs link to this repo's contributing guide.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
